تبليغاتX
Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan
 

election in corruption and groups hostage extremes

The Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan. This decision is  on The main

principals of the party which is the defence of  Democracy and humanright

Elections under the umbrella material drugs mafia groups and corrupt government Fanatic war, oppression and fear as treasure and the country thrown in the way people are taken hostage and the international community is challenged fear. Is not transparent and fair. Because all citizens of Afghanistan, political and social organizations and the Democratic National personality opportunities are not equal and fair.

The unity and struggle between the forces legitimate national democratic institutions and democratic Afghanistan and international terrorism in the disposal, save the people of Afghanistan, providing peace, genuine democracy and creating the legal system will help us.

 

 

 

 

 

+ نوشته شده توسط در دوشنبه هفدهم فروردین 1388 و ساعت 14:9 |

http://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.html 

     *****************************                            

The Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan. This decision is based on The main principals of the party which is the defence of liberal Democracy

 We believe that through the fulfilment of our main principals we can bring about a free and democratic society in which all the individuals will have equal rights before the law, because the purpose of liberal democracy is the defence of the natural rights, human rights and civil rights of individuals so that peace, national unity and the rule of law based on democracy can be achieved in Afghanistan. Likewise the purpose of liberal democracy is a non-ideological regime and the procurement of a humane law in society, so that any kind of class, racial, ethnic, tribal, religious, gender prejudices and privileges be put an end to, instead moral and human values be upheld. In view of the above principals

****************************************                               

                        

زنان افغان

we want human rights  

               

                                              

       

 

**********************************************

                    To His Excellency Ban Ki Moon

The UN General Secretary

 OUR PARTY HAVE PROTEST AGAINST SIGNATURE OF THE

PRESIDENT KARSIA BECAUSE THE  SIGNATUR IS

 VIOLATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS 

 The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan is of the opinion that the UN and the NATO member countries have sent their troops to Afghanistan in order to repel fanatical religious and terrorist forces and help restore peace and stability in the country and help the people of Afghanistan maintain , human rights, and their political and civil freedom. They are certainly not for the protection of rapacious warlords who are the lynchpin of drug trafficking and are notorious war criminals, committed large scale human rights abuses

forces in the region and the world at large under the name of so called sharia law and Islam mercilessly violate the civil, political and social freedom and liberties of the Muslim citizens of our country. They imply human rights as a message from the infidels and the west and wish to carry on with their tyrant, repressive and fanatical dictatorial regime, resorting to fanatical dictatorship through fake religious legitimacy and thus with the help of such violent traditions and demagogic behaviour, wish to carry on with their violation of human rights and liberties

It is ironical that these fanatical forces behave in a coordinated manner in the region

the violation of human rights of all those who have a different opinion and opposed to the Iranian regimes, but an interference in the internal affairs of Afghanistan

The Liberal Democratic party of Afghanistan have constantly called upon the intellectuals and defenders of human rights to unite in the fight against fanatical Islamic extremism and repel their plots and conspiracies and pre-empt their actions from impeding the process of peace, stability and progress in our country and the region. We also call upon the US, the EU and all the democratic forces of the world to back the defenders of democracy so that the terrorist and the extremist militants are stopped

With kind regards

2009 / 4 / 4  

The central council of the Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan

www.afg-liberal.blogfa.com

*******************************************************************************

Permission

On Friday, Mr de Hoop Scheffer, who was presiding over the Nato summit in Strasbourg-Kehl, told the BBC's Mark Mardell: "We are there to defend universal values and when I see, at the moment, a law threatening to come into effect which fundamentally violates women's rights and human rights, that worries me."

the Nato PRESIDENT SAID

He added: "I have a problem to explain and President Karzai knows this, because I discussed it with him. I have a problem to explain to a critical public audience in Europe, be it the UK or elsewhere, why I'm sending the guys to the Hindu Kush."

Speaking after the Nato summit on Saturday, Mr Obama said the views of his administration on the law had been communicated to Kabul.

The law, he added, had been it a key topic of conversation at the summit.

UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown held a 10-minute telephone conversation with Mr Karzai over the issue.

British officials said Mr Brown "registered his concern" about the law and was "reassured" by Mr Karzai that the matter was being referred back to the justice ministry.

France's Human Rights Minister Rama Yade also expressed her "sharp concern" at the law, saying it "recalls the darkest hours of Afghanistan's history".

The UN earlier said it was seriously concerned about the potential impact of the law.

Human rights activists say it reverses many of the freedoms won by Afghan women in the seven years since the Taleban were driven from power.

They say it removes the right of women to refuse their husbands sex, unless they are ill.

Women will also need to get permission from their husbands if they want to leave their homes, unless there is an emergency.

The law covers members of Afghanistan's Shia minority, who make up 10% of the population.

Women in Afghanistan
The law has been described as "oppressive" for women

It was rushed through parliament in February and was backed by influential Shia clerics and Shia political parties.

The law is reported to have been approved by President Karzai - who critics say is eager to win Shia votes in forthcoming elections - but the final version has not yet been made public because there are numerous amendments to it.

The president has not yet commented, but defenders of the law say it is an improvement on the customary laws which normally decide family matters.

A separate family law for the Sunni majority is now also being drawn up.

 مصاحبه محمد عیسی اسحق زایی با تلویزون 1 در امریکا

part 1

 

 

سخنرانی محمد عیسی اسحق زایی در کنفرانس حزب مشروطه ایران

 

+ نوشته شده توسط در دوشنبه دهم فروردین 1388 و ساعت 2:7 |
 

http://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.html

*********************************                         

Issa Eshaghze The president of the Liberal Democrats party of Afghanistan meeting with Peatrice Lorenhn member of the Italy Parliament and leadership of the Liberal Democrats party of Italy .On the 11th of March 2009

Mr. ISSA Eshaghze the president of the Liberal Democratic party of Afghanistan met with Ms Lorenhn member Leadership of the Lib Dem Italy and member of the Italian Parliament in the house of the parliament in Rome. At the beginning of the meeting Mr. issa Eshaghzey spoke a bout the painful socio - political situation of war, terrorism, and repression in Afghanistan and the region. Mr. Eshaghze stressed the need for further co-operation and support of the Italian parliament to the Afghan patriots and national and democratic forces of Afghanistan towards bringing about to power of a regime committed to democracy, human rights and the rule of law in the country. Subsequently, Ms Lorenhn expressed her support and the support of the Italian Lib Dem to the Lib Dem Afghanistan in the fight against terror and for democracy and human rights in Afghanistan. The meeting ended in an atmosphere of full understanding and lasting co-operation between the two sides aimed at repelling the dangers of terrorism and repression in Afghanistan and the region
********************************************

Paddy Ashdown: A strategy to save Afghanistan

Written by Mark Pack on 13th February 2008 – 7:01 pm

Writing in the FT today, Paddy said:

With fighting in Afghanistan now entering its seventh year, no agreed international strategy, public support on both sides of the Atlantic crumbling, Nato in disarray and widening insecurity in Afghanistan, defeat is now a real possibility. The consequences for both Afghanistan and its allies would be appalling: global terrorism would have won back its old haven and created a new one over the border in a mortally weakened Pakistan; our domestic security threat would be gravely increased and a new instability would be added to the world’s most unstable region.

David Miliband, the British foreign secretary, is right - in the face of these consequences, withdrawal is not an option.

But then neither is continuing as we are. So what should we do?

+ نوشته شده توسط در جمعه بیست و سوم اسفند 1387 و ساعت 14:53 |

http://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.html 

his Excellency Ban Ki Moon

the General Secretary of the UN

Afghanistan’s Liberal Democrat Party has been fighting for more than two decades to defend peace, democracy and human rights, aimed at achieving peace, justice and to defend human rights. Our party supports the UN and the global community’s schemes in their opposition to the extremist factions, unfortunately mistakes have also been made on the structural coalesce of political arrangement of Afghanistan. The present authority is in the service of warlords, drug-lords and Islamic fundamentalists, detrimental to peace, security, justice and freedom in Afghanistan

Unfortunately, during the last 6 years, in spite of the unanimous global support given to the Afghan state and its leadership, conflicts and terror are mounting and corruption is rife

The freedom of speech and freedom of thought have been shamelessly attacked by some fanatical bodies of the government, the arrest of Parwaiz Kam-bakhs and tens of other journalists are clear examples. Recently the arrest of Mr Fayaz, Ariana TV presenter for trying to disclose facts and establish the truth about crimes and corruptions of the fanatics and mafia of Kabul regime, can be another good example

Hardliners and fanatical groups are protected by the extreme regional regimes. By misusing Islam, hundreds of warlords have attacked and infringed up on people’s rights. They are busy with corruption and smuggling drugs, looting citizen’s properties, with impunity. Because of their joint financial and partisan gains, they are gathered around Karzai and enjoying the glory

In the present political environment, Parwaiz kambakh, Abdulrahman, and tens of others for holding their political opinion and their political stands are currently in prison, and some of them are sentenced to death

They have forgotten that Bon agreement was based on the commitment of defending democracy, human rights, rehabilitation of the country, and to tackle religious fanatic, and terrorism, these are the reasons behind the support of the international community and Afghan people to the current government. The Afghan Liberal Democratic Party believes that the international human right convention is expecting from the afghan state to protect its citizens, to prevent aform created a totalitarian state based on ethnicity, cast, and religious fanatic

Afghan liberal democratic Party once again call upon to the UN to urge the Karzi regime to stop and prevent the anti-democracy and violent collusion, and liberate and release those who fight for democracy, and protect the political freedom according to the rule of law and human rights

 

Yours Sincerely

28/7/2008

Afghanistan’s Liberal Democratic Party Leading Council

 

**********                                 

     

1st of June 2008 conference of the Liberal Democratic Party 

of Afghanistan

       The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan based on the main principals of the party which is the defence of the natural rights, human rights and civil rights of individuals so that peace, national unity and the rule of law based on democracy can be achieved in Afghanistan. Likewise the purpose of liberal democracy is a non-ideological regime and the procurement of a humane law in society, so that any kind of class, racial, ethnic, tribal, religious, gender prejudices and privileges be put an end to, instead moral and human values be upheld 

 Democracy and human rights    

 

     Eshaghzey ISSA President of the Libera Democratic Party of Afghanistan

******************                                  

1st of June 2008 a conference of the Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan. In this meeting president of the A National Tribal Coalition,Equality party , civil Movement of Afghanistan,  vice president and members of the constitution party of Iran,vice president of international  and members of liberal democrat party  of Belgium, and other parties and social organisation members along with national and political personalities of Afghanistan including some ex-senate and parliament members and large members of intellectuals supporting national interests and democracy in Afghanistan will participate.

The purpose of this conference is to bring together the above mentioned personalities in the fight against war and repression and dictatorship that hinder and impede the progress and political and social freedom of the people and freedom of the media. Such evil forces are the cause of war and repression in the country. In this conference the participants will also discuss the need for a common struggle and unity in order to defend democracy and human rights in the region and world at large.

**************************                              

The message of the Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan and the Council for National Understanding with Tribes dated 1st of

June to the United Nation, Europe Parliament & Americans congress

1st of June 2008   

Your Excellency

Dear Sir  

The Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan (LDPA) have consistently struggled for the salvation of Afghanistan on the basis of declaration of human rights aimed at getting rid of the menace of extremism and repelling terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism ,so that a just peace and the rule of law and democracy is established. Based on the recognition of the Afghan society and the structure of the political forces of Afghanistan and in the region and we would like to put forward the following proposals to the summit.

The LDPA while supporting the efforts of the international community at the Bonn conference of 2001 which was aimed at defeating terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism in Afghanistan would like to point out the flaws that were committed in the Bonn conference by the international community. The ouster of the Taliban from power had raised popular expectations among the helpless people of Afghanistan to finally embrace peace, security, justice, and freedom. To their utmost regret, however, all their cherished hopes were shattered. Instead of empowering the democratic and national forces politically and economically, predatory warlords--- who had brutalized and traumatized their people and committed large scale human rights abuses, incredible as it seems—were put into political positions of power and were given millions of dollars in cash. It is not surprising that relying on these warlords who have no or little education or principles, in the war on terror, has been a major strategic blunder perpetrated by the U.S. – led allies resulting in the alienation of the Afghan populous, .

On the other hand, the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and their Pakistani mentors took advantage of the widespread discontent caused by the appalling nature of governance; rampant corruption; and total disregard and disdain for the rule of law; and travesty of the principles of justice to forward their own sordid and vicious schemes.

Strangely enough, Western powers are still oblivious to the stark fact that Mr. Karzai and his cronies are a liability rather than an asset in their mission to combat terrorism, pursuing a flawed strategy supporting an inept and corrupt Kabul regime. America spent billions of dollars to legitimize the Karzai government and have failed. Now European leaders paying visit to him are repeating United States mistakes

We believe that at the Bonn conference, decisions were made very hastily and careful attention has not been paid to the political mechanism and the rights of Afghanistan. As a result, fundamentalist groups in favour of ideological regimes with the help of the mafia network and the ideological regimes in the region, managed to include their anti-democratic and anti-western individuals in the political system of Afghanistan. They enjoy the financial, intelligence and political support to establish themselves. Availing themselves of the domestic and regional opportunities by violating the Bonn Accord, they have entered Kabul and taken the key political positions in the government They have established a weak management which is mostly made up of armed commanders and. Jihadi leaders who donot believe in peace and the rule of law , human rights and security of the people themselves. Unfortunately these violators of human rights who’s rapacious and dreadful character who are known to the people of Afghanistan and have consistently violated the national interest of Afghanistan and were the principal reason for the emergence of Taliban and Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, are re-established and given military, economic, and political authorities and privileges. With the absence of a sound national and democratic leadership, these fanatical extremist anti-western forces once again, in coalition with communist groups have united as a threat to democracy and the West. The state organs of Afghanistan, despite the huge international help, are becoming a source of anti-western propaganda themselves. They abuse the system by instigating the nationalistic and religious feelings of the people against the West

We propose the following

1)

 It is for the international community and governments to support and strengthen the forces of democracy and human rights and those who uphold democratic values and national interests of Afghanistan who are ready to fight and struggle against terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism

2) 

 The International community must help replace the present corrupt and inept leadership with a professional democratic one which is committed to democracy and national unity of the country

3) 

 In order to win the hearts and minds of the people of Afghanistan and restore confidence, the International community is strongly required to bring the warlords to justice and remove them from power as the only option available in the interest of peace and security in Afghanistan

4)

 The international forces in Afghanistan is expected to stop the repression of the warlords and help bring an end to corruption and drug trafficking in Afghanistan

5) 

 NATO is expected to train, equip and strengthen the armed forces of Afghanistan on the basis of equal opportunity for everybody in Afghanistan. The present system requires fundamental reforms. The people of Afghanistan need a national army and a national police capable of defending the country and defeating the enemy by bringing peace, security, justice and freedom to the people of Afghanistan

6) 

 Reconstruction of Afghanistan and the fight against terrorism must go hand in hand. We must reach out to the rural areas where you have a large number of young people sitting idle deprived of education and work. These young individuals are a great source of recruitment for the Taliban

7) 

 As regards the NATO involvement in Afghanistan, we sincerely believe that we must fight terrorism across the border. We must cut their routes of supplies by all means. We must besiege the enemy and cut off their routes of supplies by seizing their main ports and their main incoming routes and that will only be possible if we go across the border and seize the territory surrounding and the areas around where Alqaeda is based. Otherwise NATO will face the same fate as the Russians did in Afghanistan many years ago. The government of Musharaf must be pressurized to help in this common goal, that will be the only way to defeat terrorism in the region. Lots of work must be done In the Waziristan area, to be able to bring some of the tribes on our side, and if war breaks out among the troubled tribes, we must provide ample facilities by establishing proper camps for their refugees so that they can use our territory as their strategic depth against their enemy

8) 

 International community has not yet used the national intellectual reserves of Afghanistan who think un-ideological and democratically. The absence of national and democratic movement in Afghanistan and the ascent to power of the groups within the political and judiciary system of Afghanistan, the spirit of opposition to the freedom of opinion and speech, freedom of media the absence of individual security, political assassination, violation of woman’s rights, threats to human’s rights activists, anti-western provocation, have been on the increase in recent years. Anti-western provocation. As a result, Investment in Afghanistan is decreasing and the activities of the democratic foundations are restricted. We therefore believe that without a sound administration and an absence of a humane and democratic law, it will be impossible to overcome the security difficulties in Afghanistan and defeat terrorism. Before it is too late, NATO and the international community must strive to bring about conditions for establishing the rule of law and a democratic government in compliance with the aspiration of the people of Afghanistan. We must free the people of Afghanistan from the menace of fundamental Islamic extremism and ideological regimes

 

Yours Sincerely

The steering council of the Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan

+ نوشته شده توسط در جمعه هفدهم خرداد 1387 و ساعت 17:21 |

 

Message to  liberal democrat party of AFGANISTAN 

Dear issa president of the liberal democrat party of Afganistan  
 
Unfotunitly Supereme Court of Afghanistan one month ago confirmed 20 year in prison of Afghan Journalist 
Sayed parwez Kambakhsh But didn't informed anybody, They confirmed it behined closed doors withouth presence of Kambakhsh, his lawyer, members of Family and so on. No body was in the court and no bady without them their slef didn't know it. We just found it out to day. There was no deffirence betwwen injust 4 minuts Mazar primary trail and supereme court of Afghanistan. We thought there would be a bit justice in the capital of Afghanistan and even in the highist level of Judeciarry system, but their silent decission seems that first of all there is no justice in Afghanistan even any level people thinks and second it semms that they afrid. because inside the case even their is not any single point to keep Kambakhsh in prison.
 
By the way I hope you can undristand the level of justice in Afghanistan.
 
They are just playing by humanity and are not care about anything. Every thing is completely politicized here, they are kiding human rights, democracy, freedom of speech and so on to just follow their political aims. Unfortunitily it is happening and it is reallity.
 
Now Kambakhsh is a victim        
 
***********************************************************
Message to freedom for kambakhsh   
 
we want right of speech            

           

  To his Excellency Ban ki moon the General Secratry of the UN

Dear Sir

The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan is of the opinion that the UN and the NATO member countries have sent their troops to Afghanistan in order to repel fanatical religious and terrorist forces and help restore peace and stability in the country and help the people of Afghanistan maintain democracy, human rights, and their political and civil freedom. They are certainly not for the protection of rapacious warlords who are the lynchpin of drug trafficking and are notorious war criminals, committed large scale human rights abuses

It so appears that after the Bonn conference, political, financial, military, and state power has remained in the hands of these de-facto rulers of Afghanistan. They have continued with their repression of the innocent and defenceless people of Afghanistan. They are trying to suppress democratic voices by means of intimidation and killing of tens of journalists and other men of opinion for their beliefs. The persecution of Mr Abdul Rahman for conversion of his creed and the sentencing to death by means of hanging of Mr Kambakhsh are vivid examples of injustice and criminal behaviour of these warlords who have taken the law in to their hands

We have also witnessed yet again another violent, vindictive and inhumane action and antisocial behaviour of another warlord i.e. Rashid Dostum who on the 3rd of February 2008 carried out a raid on the residence of his opponent and resorted to the beating and kicking around of a respected law abiding Afghan citizen by the name of Akbar Bai and his family members including his wife. This is absolutely outrageous

The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan, while condemning such rampant violation of human rights in the strongest possible terms, demand that decisive and practical measures be adopted against these criminals who have committed human rights abuses and looted the properties of the people of Afghanistan in the past three decades. They must be brought to justice before it is too late for the world community to regain the momentum and the trust of the Afghans in the West and the UN

The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan also believe that in the last Afghan election unfortunately everything went their way. They had the financial backing of the West both in the capital Kabul and in the countryside/ They also enjoyed the publicity and the legitimacy that was provided by the US for these criminals. In the process of these elections, to our great dismay, democratic and patriotic forces (National forces) in the country were totally ignored by the West. Only a handful of democrats and technocrats who upon the persistence of the international community had managed to participate in the formation of the Afghan government who could have made a real difference in the political process towards democracy, were also eventually isolated and removed through conspiracies. The remaining few democratic elements within the government have remained in difficult situation. The Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan call upon the UN, US, European community with due respect to help prevent these criminals and human right abusers of Afghanistan from committing more crimes and abuses in the country. They must not be allowed to deny the people of Afghanistan their civil and social liberties. We also hope that you the Excellency will personally intervene in the case of Mr Kambakhsh and help secure his release from the clutches of these barbaric institutions. Let us put an end to the flagrant violation of human rights in Afghan society by the fanatical religious forces and bring restore security, peace, freedom, and justice in Afghanistan

The Leadership Council of the Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan

               

 

+ نوشته شده توسط در جمعه شانزدهم فروردین 1387 و ساعت 21:53 |

 

http://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.html 

   ************************************************             

                       A message of the Liberal Democrat Party of

 Afghanistan to the NATO summit meeting dated 4th

of April 2008 in Bucharest, Romania. Your

Excellency’s members of the NATO

The Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan (LDPA) have consistently struggled for the salvation of Afghanistan on the basis of declaration of human rights aimed at getting rid of the menace of extremism and repelling terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism ,so that a just peace and the rule of law and democracy is established. Based on the recognition of the Afghan society and the structure of the political forces of Afghanistan and in the region and we would like to put forward the following proposals to the summit

The LDPA while supporting the efforts of the international community at the Bonn conference of 2001 which was aimed at defeating terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism in Afghanistan would like to point out the flaws that were committed in the Bonn conference by the international community. The ouster of the Taliban from power had raised popular expectations among the helpless people of Afghanistan to finally embrace peace, security, justice, and freedom. To their utmost regret, however, all their cherished hopes were shattered. Instead of empowering the democratic and national forces politically and economically, predatory warlords--- who had brutalized and traumatized their people and committed large scale human rights abuses, incredible as it seems—were put into political positions of power and were given millions of dollars in cash. It is not surprising that relying on these warlords who have no or little education or principles, in the war on terror, has been a major strategic blunder perpetrated by the U.S. – led allies resulting in the alienation of the Afghan populous

On the other hand, the Taliban and Al-Qaeda and their fundamentalist group in Pakistani mentors took advantage of the widespread discontent caused by the appalling nature of governance; rampant corruption; and total disregard and disdain for the rule of law; and travesty of the principles of justice to forward their own sordid and vicious schemes

Strangely enough, Western powers are still oblivious to the stark fact that Mr. Karzai and his cronies are a liability rather than an asset in their mission to combat terrorism, pursuing a flawed strategy supporting an inept and corrupt Kabul regime. America spent billions of dollars to legitimize the Karzai government and have failed 

We believe that at the Bonn conference, decisions were made very hastily and careful attention has not been paid to the political mechanism and the rights of Afghanistan. As a result, fundamentalist groups in favour of ideological regimes with the help of the mafia network and the ideological regimes in the region, managed to include their anti-democratic and anti-western individuals in the political system of Afghanistan. They enjoy the financial, intelligence and political support to establish themselves. Availing themselves of the domestic and regional opportunities by violating the Bonn Accord, they have entered Kabul and taken the key political positions in the government They have established a weak management which is mostly made up of armed commanders and. Jihadi leaders who donot believe in peace and the rule of law , human rights and security of the people themselves. Unfortunately these violators of human rights who’s rapacious and dreadful character who are known to the people of Afghanistan and have consistently violated the national interest of Afghanistan and were the principal reason for the emergence of Taliban and Al-Qaeda in Afghanistan, are re-established and given military, economic, and political authorities and privileges. With the absence of a sound national and democratic leadership, these fanatical extremist anti-western forces once again, in coalition with communist groups have united as a threat to democracy and the West. The state organs of Afghanistan, despite the huge international help, are becoming a source of anti-western propaganda themselves. They abuse the system by instigating the nationalistic and religious feelings of the people against the WestWe propose the following

 It is for the NATO states and governments to support and strengthen the forces of democracy and human rights and those who uphold democratic values and national interests of Afghanistan who are ready to fight and struggle against terrorism and Islamic fundamentalism

 NATO must replace the present corrupt and inept leadership with a professional democratic one which is committed to democracy and national unity of the country

 In order to win the hearts and minds of the people of Afghanistan and restore confidence, NATO is required to bring the warlords to justice and remove them from power as the only option available

 NATO is expected to stop the repression of the warlords and put an end to corruption and drug trafficking in Afghanistan

 NATO is expected to train, equip and strengthen the armed forces of Afghanistan on the basis of equal opportunity for everybody in Afghanistan. The present system requires fundamental reforms. The people of Afghanistan need a national army and a national police capable of defending the country and defeating the enemy by bringing peace, security, justice and freedom to the people of Afghanistan

 Reconstruction of Afghanistan and the fight against terrorism must go hand in hand. We must reach out to the rural areas where you have a large number of young people sitting idle deprived of education and work. These young individuals are a great source of recruitment for the Taliban

 As regards the NATO involvement in Afghanistan, we sincerely believe that we must fight terrorism across the border. We must cut their routes of supplies by all means. We must besiege the enemy and cut off their routes of supplies by seizing their main ports and their main incoming routes and that will only be possible if we go across the border and seize the territory surrounding and the areas around where Alqaeda is based. Otherwise NATO will face the same fate as the Russians did in Afghanistan many years ago. The government of Musharaf must be pressurized to help in this common goal, that will be the only way to defeat terrorism in the region. Lots of work must be done In the Waziristan area, to be able to bring some of the tribes on our side, and if war breaks out among the troubled tribes, we must provide ample facilities by establishing proper camps for their refugees so that they can use our territory as their strategic depth against their enemy

 International community has not yet used the national intellectual reserves of Afghanistan who think un-ideological and democratically. The absence of national and democratic movement in Afghanistan and the ascent to power of the groups within the political and judiciary system of Afghanistan, the spirit of opposition to the freedom of opinion and speech, freedom of media the absence of individual security, political assassination, violation of woman’s rights, threats to human’s rights activists, anti-western provocation, have been on the increase in recent years. Anti-western provocation. As a result, Investment in Afghanistan is decreasing and the activities of the democratic foundations are restricted. We therefore believe that without a sound administration and an absence of a humane and democratic law, it will be impossible to overcome the security difficulties in Afghanistan and defeat terrorism. Before it is too late, NATO and the international community must strive to bring about conditions for establishing the rule of law and a democratic government in compliance with the aspiration of the people of Afghanistan. We must free the people of Afghanistan from the menace of fundamental Islamic extremism and ideological regimes

May we take this opportunity and congratulate you on the summit and we hope that the conference be a successful one in bringing peace, security, and justice to Afghanistan and the world at large

Yours Sincerely

 The leadership council of the Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan

          ******************************                  

Unfulfilled promises haunt Afghanistan

 Gone are the days when the Afghan summer was the season of plenty

Now, as the snow melts off the Afghan peaks, a sense of foreboding hangs in the air.

The summer in Afghanistan is fighting season. 

Over a traditional Afghan dinner of rice, lamb and delicious Afghan bread, a senior

Afghan official in his Kabul mansion admits he expects Taleban attacks to rise, but

insists that they will not win. 

"They can't take over any place," he says, as he struggles with a bony piece of meat.

After a few seconds he forgets the food and repeats in a serious tone the Afghan

government line that continuing Taleban suicide bombings shows their "weakness.

But he says the fighting is at stalemate and blames alleged outside support.  

"We are fighting a war whose very source is based outside of Afghanistan, inside of

Pakistan. As long as the Taleban has a base, we won't be able to win this war."

Chaotic

While the doubts about the fight against the Taleban continue, so too do the doubts

among ordinary Afghans about life since the Taleban were toppled in 2001.

An Afghan woman holds her baby as she begs money at a traffic jam in Kabul, Afghanistan (file photo)
Many ordinary Afghans are living in extremely difficult circumstances

 

One morning I took an early tour of Kabul.

At 0700 there was already a chaotic traffic jam at Charahi Malak Azghar in the heart of the city.

Land cruisers belonging to the United Nations, warlords and government officials sit alongside taxis and vehicles belonging to common Afghans.

All of these vehicles are competing for space. There are no traffic lights, and no traffic rules. Street children and beggars were gathered along the main road.

Saqib Baghlani, 43, a high school teacher, sits on his old Chinese bicycle.

He welcomes the demise of the Taleban. "Afghanistan has made remarkable progress compared to its pre-war and Taleban days," declares the tall, confident, blue-eyed teacher.

But he says the failures of his government are unacceptable.

He insists that President Hamed Karzai should fire corrupt officials and provide people with basic services, such as health care and clean drinking water, as this could bring peace.

Afghan children at a refugee camp in Kabul, Afghanistan 12/06/08
There is growing international pressure to improve living standards

 

"Go and see who owns these expensive houses in (the suburb of) Wazir Akbar Khan and who is driving land cruisers," he says. "Karzai should ask these officials how they got so rich overnight, instead of making empty promises again and again."

 

He castigates government ministers. "We are not asking for skyscrapers. The demands of our people are simple. Millions of dollars are going towards land cruisers and salaries. Everyone is corrupt."

What puzzles poorer Afghans is why so many basic problems haven't been solved, despite the billions of dollars of international aid.

A short walk from the affluent neighbourhoods of Wazir Akbar Khan and Shari Naw, in the streets of downtown Kabul, Afghanistan's unemployed are gathered in their hundreds.

Most say they have to wait for days, hoping to find one day's work to feed their entire family.

Kabul is considered the safest spot in the country, but basic services such as clean drinking water, electricity, and sewage systems remain unavailable to most people.

Waiting outside one of Kabul's main government hospitals is Haji Baz Mohammad. He has accompanied a patient from his home province in northern Afghanistan. He is busy praying and is visibly sad.

''We are not politicians or people who have the aid money," he says. "Where are the roads, clinics and reconstruction that were promised to us?''

Climate of mistrust

 

Driving through west Kabul, you can still see the destruction wrought during the factional infighting between warring Mujahideen factions in 1992, which left at least 70,000 Kabulis dead and the Afghan capital destroyed.

Pakistani militants in a tribal district bordering Afghanistan (file photo)
Cross-border attacks from Taleban fighters in Afghanistan are on the rise

One of the most pervasive problems in post-Taleban Afghanistan is corruption.

Cabinet ministers and parliamentarians vow to fight it at every level. President Hamid Karzai has established several anti-corruption offices.

But, for Afghans like Ajmal Haidary, 42, a shopkeeper in West Kabul, this is another empty promise. "Every night, I hear ministers and MPs talk about corruption; this is all talk."

 

One aide to President Karzai admits the government has failed and that it needs to attend to the plight of the people.

But he says you have to remember the strains on Kabul, a city originally built for 400,000 that is now home to almost four million people.

"From traffic jams to corruption to a lack of electricity, it's a failure that needs to be fixed before it is too late," he says. "However, don't forget the improvements we have achieved."

One judicial official warns that there is a culture of impunity in Afghanistan now that creates a climate of mistrust among common Afghans.

Seven years after the Taleban were removed from power, the worry is that for many Afghans the promises of a better future seem to be becoming a distant dream

 Friday, 13 June 2008 17:05            

France sets out Afghan deployment

France could send "a few hundred" extra troops to Afghanistan, French Prime Minister Francois Fillon has told MPs.

In a stormy National Assembly debate, he rejected opposition Socialist calls for a parliamentary vote on the plan.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy is expected to announce the details of a new deployment to Afghanistan at a Nato summit this week in Bucharest, Romania.

France currently has more than 1,400 troops in Afghanistan, part of the

47,000-strong Nato-led force, Isaf.

He told the National Assembly: "Our armed forces in Afghanistan may invest more in the command structures, particularly in Kabul, in training the Afghan army and in the units in the Afghan provinces.

"The numbers could be something like a few hundred extra soldiers."

'New Vietnam'

An opinion poll on Monday said 68% of French people disapproved of any strengthening of the French troop presence in Afghanistan. Just 15% approved.

Mr Fillon rejected opposition calls for a vote, saying one had not been held when a previous government decided in 2001 to take part in Nato's Afghanistan mission.

But the Socialists warned France risked becoming mired in a "new Vietnam".

Jean-Marc Ayrault, the opposition's leader in the National Assembly, suggested Mr Sarkozy's "Atlantic obsession" of closer ties with the US was behind the plan.

Mr Fillon reiterated French conditions to any new troop deployment, saying there must be faster reconstruction.

He also said by the summer of 2009 the Afghan army had to take responsibility for security around Kabul, where the bulk of French troops are based.

And the French prime minister called on other Nato allies to boost their forces.

Britain and the US have frequently called on other Nato members to send more soldiers to fight the Taleban.

ISAF REGIONAL COMMANDS AND RECONSTRUCTION TEAMS
Map showing regional commands and reconstruction areas in Afghanistan
Countries contributing more than 1,000 troops (1 April 2008):
Australia - 1,100
Canada 2,500
France 1,430
Germany - 3,490
Italy - 2,360
Netherlands - 1,730
Poland - 1,020
UK - 7,750
US - 19,000
Figures approximate
Source: ISAF

                                 **************************

      

Germany is to provide 420 million euros ($655 million) for reconstruction in Afghanistan, the Foreign Ministry said ahead of a major aid conference on Afghanistan in Paris on Thursday12jun2008

The German Foreign Ministry said the announcement was being made at the halfway mark of the Afghanistan Compact, agreed at the London Afghanistan conference held in 2006. The German contributions now covered the entire period 2008-2010 agreed under the Afghanistan Compact. 

The Foreign Ministry said considerable success had been achieved, although training Afghan security forces remained a priority in light of the continuing fragile security situation.

Thursday's Paris Conference, being attended by almost 90 countries, offered an opportunity for taking stock of the situation and talking about the remaining challenges, it said.

Afghan president Hamid Karzai will table a sweeping five-year reconstruction plan for economic and infrastructure reconstruction on Thursday.

One of the government's new priorities will be agriculture, along with energy, public health and education. But infrastructure and security are the main focus of the strategy, requiring some $17 billion and $14 billion in aid respectively.

The plan acknowledges some successes since the removal of the Taliban, such as the staging of democratic elections and the moves taken towards building an army and getting more children back to school.

But the summary of the document said that both the government itself and its international partners had underestimated the extent of the obstacles to peace and prosperity.

Analysts say it is a realistic assessment of the needs still facing the country seven years after the extremist Taliban regime was overthrown.

World Bank wants more checks and balances

Picture of a suicide bombing in KabulBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  The security situation remains precarious

But the World Bank is among the organizations that have raised concerns about how well the plan prioritizes its aims and whether the corruption-dogged government can really handle such an enormous sum.

A recent finance ministry report said the government spent 55 percent of available development funds in the last fiscal year, one reason being a lack of capacity.

And aid organizations have said that much donated money and other aid never reaches the Afghan population. In a recent report, the World Bank asked for more assurances that any donated funds would be properly spent. The organization also urged the Afghan government to take on more of the work that is currently being done by others.

Bank managing director Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala said the government must "tackle corruption, raise more revenue and establish a level playing field for the private sector."

A Western official told French news agency AFP that donor pledges would be "substantially larger" that the 10.5 billion dollars promised at an aid meeting in London in 2006. But he added that no one expected the full amount to be handed over immediately, predicting a follow-up meeting before the end of the five-year period.

The international community would probably prioritize energy and agriculture projects and the 2009 presidential and 2010 parliamentary elections, the official also forecast.

Honest depiction of the state of the nation

World Bank base Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  The World Bank is calling for more transparency about the use of the funds

Oxfam Policy and Advocacy Adviser Matt Waldman said the country's reconstruction plan was the most candid so far in its description of the immense challenges facing the country.

He said the one omission was "peace building" at local levels to address instability, while the emphasis on private sector-led development did not sufficiently consider the difficult business environment here.

"It is not going to change things overnight but it is a reasonably good foundation for future work," he told AFP.

French President Nicolas Sarkozy has called for increasing the use of civil organizations in Agfhan reconstruction, in order to integrate the radical Islamic group Taliban in the effort.

He has said the military approach, which costs 100 million dollars a day, must not be the sole method used in Afghanistan.

Currently, some 47,000 foreign soldiers, mostly from NATO member states, are stationed in Afghanistan, to support the 63,000-strong Afghan army.

 
 

 

THE THIRD WORLD WAR: Why NATO Troops Can't Deliver Peace in Afghanistan

Spiegel Online International (Germany)

29 May

By: Ullrich Fichter

Forty nations are embroiled in an unwinnable war in Afghanistan. Anyone who travels through the country with Western troops soon realizes that NATO forces would have to be increased tenfold for peace to be even a remote possibility.

Thirteen days before the next attempt on his life, Afghan President Hamid Karzai arrives at a cabinet meeting, surrounded by a swarm of bodyguards. He holds his shirt collar shut against the rainy cold in Kabul. It's a Monday in mid-April -- and while there may be some good news this morning, most of it is bad.

The Canadians want Karzai to dismiss the governor of Kandahar, the United Nations contingent is missing 50,000 tons of food and the Kazakh ambassador is promising money for a hospital in Bamyan. A suicide bomber has blown himself up in Helmand, the Norwegian defense minister is visiting Kabul and the opium harvest has begun in southern Afghanistan. A cabinet meeting is about to begin in the presidential palace.

Karzai is the last to arrive, long after his ministers have gathered at the palace. Visitors must pass through four security checkpoints, walk through metal detectors three times and turn over their bags to be sniffed by dogs.

It takes an hour to reach the innermost courtyard, where Karzai's palace -- the cheerful villa Gul Khana, set in a garden planted with cedar trees -- is located. When the president enters the room at 9 a.m., everyone sitting around the long conference table stands up, 28 men and one woman. This is the group that governs Afghanistan -- officially, at least.

To begin the meeting, an imam chants lengthy suras from the Koran. Then Karzai listens to a report from his defense minister, who has just returned from a trip to India. The president's demeanor is that of a royal leader. Instead of asking many questions, he simply gives orders. He is not wearing his trademark felt cap and brightly colored coat.

Instead, he chairs the meeting in his shirtsleeves, and the demands he imposes on the cabinet are impossible. He wants the ministers to take immediate action against high food prices, he orders the transportation minister to finally bring security to the highway between Kabul and Kandahar, and he says: "It's raining in the north; at least that's good news."

At 10:15, a secretary wearing a pinstriped suit enters the room quietly, sidles along the table and hands the president a piece of paper. Karzai reads the note and nods. The aide leaves the room and returns with a telephone.

Karzai picks up the receiver, and when he speaks everyone in the room can hear him. "What? Pakistani troops have crossed the border? Where exactly? They're shooting with rockets? There is fighting?" The news descends on Karzai's mood like a hammer. He hangs up the phone, wipes his hand across his bald head and says: "I handed the students at the university their diplomas yesterday. That was a very good day."

Good days are in short supply in Afghanistan, a country at war -- or involved in several wars, to be exact. There is constant fighting on many fronts, hard and soft. The newspapers, and there are many of them in Kabul now, serve up pages of chaotic images every day.

Their reports are about bombs and drinking water, holy warriors and wheat prices, NATO air attacks and schoolbooks, kidnapped children, refugees and bandits.

Almost seven years have passed since the overthrow of the Taliban regime, and in those seven years half of the world has tried to bring a better future and, most of all, peace to this new country, the Islamic Republic of Afghanistan.

As part of the NATO military operation known as the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF), 40 nations have 60,000 soldiers deployed in the country. There are 26 United Nations organizations in Afghanistan, and hundreds of private and government agencies are pumping money, materials and know-how into the country's 34 provinces. But anyone seeking success stories or asking about failures will encounter reports that do not seem to be coming from the same country.

According to the speeches and statements Western military officials, diplomats and politicians are constantly churning out, the security situation has improved substantially, the military successes are obvious and the Taliban are as good as defeated. But peace and Afghanistan, say the Afghanis when speaking to a domestic audience, are still two incompatible words.

Last year, 1,469 bombs exploded along Afghan roads, a number almost five times as high as in 2004. There were 8,950 armed attacks on troops and civilian support personnel, 10 times more than only three years earlier. One hundred and thirty suicide bombers blew themselves up in 2007. There were three suicide bombings in 2004.

There is no peace anywhere in Afghanistan, not even in the north, which officials repeatedly insist has been pacified. Anyone who travels the country -- making the obligatory rounds to its ministries, speaking with Western ambassadors, UN directors, ISAF commanders and provincial governors, and meeting with women's rights activists, narcotics officers and police chiefs -- is bound to return with many dark questions and an ominous feeling that this mission is not a task to be measured in years, but in decades, many decades.

A dramatic chapter in world history is being written in the process, in this country dominated by the Hindu Kush mountains and the formidable Sefid Kuh range, and the endless deserts of Kandahar and Helmand.

The United States and Europe have stumbled their way into a new type of international war, one in which all of today's global and regional powers are involved. What will happen to NATO if it fails in the first out-of-area mission in its history? And where will the UN be if this ambitious nation-building project is ultimately a disappointment?

The country is in the grip of global interest-driven politics. It is, as so often in its history, a pawn on a chessboard surrounded by many more than two players. If the concerted efforts of the Western community are not delivering results as quickly as expected, this can be attributed partly to the fact that the efforts of one half of the world are constantly being thwarted by those of the other half.

While NATO tries to disarm the population, the flow of bazookas and guns coming into the country from Pakistan remains unabated. The Iranian government is accused of promoting the trade in Afghan opium and heroin to inflict harm on the West. Meanwhile, Russia is blamed for using its Soviet-era influence to weaken NATO, its old rival, on Afghan soil. China, Afghanistan's easternmost neighbor, hopes to exploit untapped mineral sources in the nearby mountains.

Dubai, the Liechtenstein of the Middle East, offers a place to launder and park dirty money. It is as if a first, crude world war of the 21st century were taking place on Afghan soil, a war that remains unacknowledged and undeclared.

"What We're Fighting For"

"Look at this," says ISAF Commander Dan McNeill, wearing sunglasses as he stands next to a Canadian C-130 transport plane about to take off from Kabul's military airport. "Look, take a picture of this. This here is what we're fighting for." The general cuts through the delegation he is accompanying to Helmand in the south. He pushes aside Zalmai Rassoul, President Karzai's national security advisor, brushing past deputy interior ministers and even General Karimi, the chief of operations for the Afghan national army. On this hazy day, McNeill finally reaches the lone woman standing at the back of the group, an Afghan woman, wearing makeup and no veil.

McNeill presents her like a trophy, and says: "Here, this is it." The woman, a government employee who looks to be about 40, smiles shyly and gives the impression of wanting to be somewhere else. The four-star general, wearing his combat uniform, poses for a photograph with the woman. McNeill, in his last few days as ISAF commander and accustomed to giving orders, says: "Write about this. This is why we're here."

The flight to Helmand passes along mountain chains south of Kabul. Within about an hour, the plane lands at Camp Bastion, little more than a dusty airstrip in a vast, empty desert. The delegation from Kabul has to transfer to a helicopter to reach Lashkar Gah, the capital of Helmand Province. There they will meet with the new governor, Gulab Mangal, who has invited them to attend a grand shura, or council of elders, leaders and religious figures.

The travelers board two Sea Knight helicopters, which take them on a high-speed, low-altitude flight westward across a sea of opium poppy fields.

At the landing site, a soccer field, the guests board armored personnel carriers in groups of three and don bulletproof vests. Eventually the long convoy embarks on what amounts to a very short journey. The destination, the governor's official residence, is less than 300 meters from the soccer field, past Afghan soldiers who line the street, saluting the visiting dignitaries.

Leading up to the Helmand trip, McNeill had been brimming with success stories and rosy analyses. He said: "All neighboring countries are interested in regional stability." And he said that not a single child could attend school before the ISAF operation began, and that there are now 6 million schoolchildren in the country. Of course, the general added, there are still "volatile areas" along the border with Pakistan. But the security situation, he insisted, had "improved significantly."

He said the terrorists are, by and large, little more than a fractured bunch, no longer capable of launching substantial attacks. Those were the words of Dan McNeill, the words he used in his messages intended for a Western audience, the words he used in his standard speech, written for chancellors and prime ministers. But little of what the general said jibes with the reports he is now getting during his visit to Helmand.

Bomb Attacks, Roadside Bandits and Kidnappers

In an office behind closed doors, filled with furniture upholstered in a floral motif, the governor reports that half of the districts in his province are out of control. Alliances formed by the Taliban and drug barons, he says, rule the villages, and none of the highways are safe against bomb attacks, roadside bandits and kidnappers.

According to Mangal, Pakistan has a finger in every pie here, driving the teachers from the schools (the ones that haven't been burned to the ground yet), and forcing farmers to plant opium poppies.

The delegates from Kabul listen and drink their tea. They are listening to familiar words, the words of reports meant for the Afghan and not the Western public, words that are brutally realistic and unadorned.

McNeill promises the governor that he is now able to send an additional 3,200 US Marines to Helmand, and that the British have also maximized their troop levels in the province. Things are moving forward, the general insists, and things will continue to move forward. Karzai's people promise money and show good faith.

The guests nibble on nuts and raisins, and after two hours the conversation begins to subside. "If you want people to produce melons instead of heroin, you have to give them a market for melons," says a man in the governor's group. No one even attempts to respond to his sentence. Food is brought in: soup, salad, flatbread and kebabs on long skewers. The armored personnel carriers are waiting outside. It's time for the guests to return to Kabul.

Three Million People Whose Livelihoods Depend on Opium

Since the fall of the Taliban regime almost seven years ago, the country's opium harvest has been more abundant in almost each successive year. Last year, 93 percent of the heroin traded in the world came from Afghanistan. In 2007, opium poppies were grown on 193,000 hectares (476,900 acres), a 17-percent increase over the previous year. Meanwhile, ISAF looks on without taking any action. But its inaction is a precautionary measure.

For fear of triggering hostility against foreign troops among the local population, the powers that be agreed early on that the Afghans would have sole responsibility for waging the drug war, with no NATO involvement whatsoever. To demonstrate their supposed commitment, the police and Afghan army occasionally stage symbolic drug burnings, and sometimes they even wade into the fields to decapitate a few plants. The operation, dubbed "eradication," is one of the most dangerous in this war.

The narcotics agents routinely face enemy fire. The drug mafia's militias, the Taliban and al-Qaida, launch perfectly planned counterattacks, almost as if someone had faxed them the government forces' plans in advance. Drugs and corruption go hand-in-hand in Afghanistan, where a policeman can count himself lucky if he earns €200 to €300 ($315 to $470) a month. When the harvest begins, even army officers shed their uniforms to work in the fields as pickers. Teachers moonlight as smugglers, mayors operate heroin laboratories and provincial governors have been stopped with 150 kilograms (331 pounds) of pure heroin in the trunks of their cars.

"We assume that 500,000 families have their fingers in the pie," says General Mohammed Daoud, once a young commander under the legendary mujahedeen leader Ahmed Shah Massoud. Today Daoud is the deputy interior minister in charge of running Kabul's anti-drug operation. "And if you consider that an Afghan family has at least six members," says Daoud, "you have 3 million people in our country whose livelihood depends on opium production." This contingent, one-tenth of the country's total population of 30 million, is much larger than any army in Afghanistan.

Daoud has 2,500 men under his command to wage his battle against the opium industry. Last year, his department arrested 820 smugglers, nabbed 20 corrupt army officers, destroyed 63 heroin laboratories and removed tons of heroin from the market.

But when Daoud's people capture a few criminals, the arrests are nothing but symbolic. Afghanistan has never developed anything approaching an effective judicial system. There are no mechanisms in place to enforce sentences, and there are few lawyers and judges. Although the country supposedly has 1,500 prosecutors, only half of them have studied law. "We have certainly arrested people and sentenced them to 19 years in prison," says Daoud, "but all of them were released by the next day."

It is still 10 days before the next attempt on the life of Hamid Karzai. It is near the end of April, and there is good news and a lot of bad news. In Zabul and Ghazni, dozens of Taliban fighters are killed in battles with government troops, while Afghanistan's women's network expresses its concern over the growing number of children being forced into marriages.

In Nimruz, a suicide bomber blows himself up in front of a mosque, killing 23 people. Germany promises additional millions of euros for police training. And in the Maiwand district of Kandahar Province, soldiers in the B Company of the Third Battalion of the British Parachute Regiment are preparing for a patrol.

The unit has received warnings that the enemy has planted remotely detonated bombs northeast of Hutal, in planning quadrant 9951. Hutal is a small district capital with about 7,000 residents living in mud huts, with no electricity or running water. The town has a bazaar along the main street, a school, a veterinarian and, in the north, an old fort that the British once tried to capture, albeit unsuccessfully, in the 19th century.

'We Know They're Out There Somewhere'

They arrived here in late March, the first Western troops to set foot in the area. The Canadians, who are in fact responsible for Kandahar, lacked the manpower to deploy troops to all of the districts in the province. When the British arrived, they expected to encounter resistance. They brought in 500 soldiers, vehicles and equipment, and on March 26 they stood, in the gaping desert north of Hutal, and proceeded to march westward into operations zones identified on their maps with names like "Birmingham," "Camberley" and "Thailand." But nothing happened.

They drove and marched for four days, hoping to flush out the enemy, but all they found were generators in "Burma," which they seized, and an enemy radio station in "Malaysia." But the fighters themselves, from the Taliban and other groups, were nowhere to be found. They turned to Hutal, where they wanted to establish a base, and were assigned three dilapidated concrete police buildings. It is a drafty, sandy outpost, where the men haven't shaved in five weeks and have had little opportunity to shower or even wash themselves, and where they spend much of their time lounging around, drinking instant tea from plastic bottles.

"They're hiding," says Major Stuart McDonald, a 35-year-old company commander with a Jesus-like face. At home, his daughter celebrated her third birthday three days ago, "which breaks my heart." He and his officers are standing on a makeshift veranda surrounded with sandbags, planning a patrol toward the northeast, where there could be bombs, and where they hope that they finally will be able to flush out the enemy.

"We know that they're out there somewhere," says McDonald. "They are observing us, but they're hiding. It's pathetic." His unit, known in Great Britain simply as "3 Para," is part of an elite force within the British Army.

At the beginning of the week, his men opened fire on a teenager on a moped who, with his brother sitting on the back, was foolishly driving in their direction. They could only conclude that he was a suicide bomber, because he ignored all gestures and all warnings, and simply continued driving toward them. The company doctor later tended to his wounds, and now the boy is up and walking in his village again, but the mood has deteriorated since then. The locals say that the foreign troops are shooting at their children.

The company's 6th Platoon, a group of 30 to 35 men, heads out on patrol, leaving the camp in loose formation, their guns at the ready, and turns toward the northeast. Since the moped shooting incident, the locals know that it's better to stop whenever they see soldiers. Now life comes to a sudden standstill as soon as the British appear. Cars stop and pedestrians freeze. Only on the highway do trucks and buses continue traveling. The buses are carrying migrant workers from around the country who have come to work in the opium harvest. There are hundreds of buses, traveling around the clock, many with German writing on the sides: "Prima Tours Günther" or "Alpina Express."

The soldiers cross a wide, dry riverbed where there are freshly dug graves marked by flags of mourning and the green color of the prophet. The air is hot and heavy with the stench of decay. Children, women and the elderly gather in front of dwellings along the route, standing still and staring at the soldiers. The foreigners occasionally toss pieces of chewing gum or chocolate to the children. Every child here knows one English sentence by heart: "Mister, give me one dollar."

The soldiers have soon reached the desert, a landscape of sand and stone stretching to the horizon, which is part of enemy territory near the road and may be mined. They are in planning quadrant 9951. The paratroopers stop to rest. It is hot and each of them is carrying 60 pounds of equipment. They kneel in the sand and drink from their canteens. Then they continue marching, without making enemy contact, in a wide arc back to the camp.

The Taliban and their allies have learned that man-to-man combat with NATO troops isn't worthwhile. Anyone who attacks a US platoon or a British unit directly will likely face the devastating firepower of Apache helicopters within minutes. This realization has led to the development of a ghostly indirect war, a war by remote control, conducted with booby traps, land mines, home-made explosives and cars turned into bombs.

It is a lopsided contest.

The Western troops, most of them still trained to conduct land-based wars the way warfare was waged at the beginning of the 20th century, are faced with an adversary that carries guerilla tactics to the extreme. The Taliban, whoever they are, are not bound by any NATO doctrine, and certainly not by the Geneva Convention. According to their logic, the mass murder of civilians can be counted as a victory. Blowing up the guests at a wedding can provide strategic advantages, while television images of dead children become a dirty bomb in the battle for public opinion.

ISAF Flags Provide Illusion of Success

In the evening, the British play volleyball in their camp. The pitch is delineated with pieces of rope on the ground, while a burning pile of garbage smolders in an adjacent hole in the ground. One in four soldiers suffers from chronic diarrhea, and all of them have sunburns. Major McDonald is pleased, he says, "that this vacation here will soon be over."

The paratroopers are getting ready to move on to Helmand, where they will join up with US Marines. A Portuguese company will replace them at the Hutal camp. Two of the Portuguese commanding officers visited the camp at noon. Since then, Major McDonald's mood has worsened significantly.

The Portuguese were not satisfied with the condition of the camp. They asked their British counterparts whether it would be possible to set up an Internet café prior to their arrival. They also wanted an ice machine and an ATM. "An Internet café," says McDonald, "and an ice machine, now that's impressive."

The next attempt on the life of Hamid Karzai is still nine days away. April days are hot in Kandahar, as the Portuguese move into the camp at Hutal. An advance guard arrives in the early morning hours in Humvees with the Portuguese flag fluttering from the antennas, looking like victors entering captured enemy territory.

The Portuguese soldiers pose in front of their vehicles in groups, taking pictures to send home and behaving as if they were on vacation. McDonald, the British major, stands there, looking disgusted. He hands over command of the camp to his successor, the Portuguese commander Antonio Cancelinha. When the two men shake hands, they look as if they hoped to never cross paths again.

Anyone standing in front of a map of Afghanistan, with shading delineating the five ISAF regional commands, must conclude that the country is under control. Colorful little flags identify the NATO troops' presence throughout the country, with Germany's colors flying in the northeast, Italy's in the far west, the Stars and Stripes covering the east, and the Union Jack and Canada's Maple Leaf blanketing the south. Interspersed among these flags are those of the Turks, the Dutch, the Lithuanians, Australians, Swedes and Spaniards. But the flags are an illusion.

ISAF Commander McNeill has said himself that according to the current counterterrorism doctrine, it would take 400,000 troops to pacify Afghanistan in the long term. But the reality is that he has only 47,000 soldiers under his command, together with another 18,000 troops fighting at their sides as part of Operation Enduring Freedom, and possibly another 75,000 reasonably well-trained soldiers in the Afghan army by the end of the year. All told, there is still a shortfall of 260,000 men.

Large, intricately subdivided tables hang on the wall at ISAF headquarters in Kabul. The charts indicate which troops, from which country, can be used for which operations -- or, conversely, are barred from engaging in certain operations. Very few units can be used for everything, including combat missions. In conversation, General McNeill says that NATO is running "on reserve" in Afghanistan. Otherwise, he says, cooperation is "generally quite good."

Good News and a Lot of Bad News

Seven days still remain before the next attempt on Hamid Karzai's life, and on this day the World Health Organization (WHO) and the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) are launching a vaccination campaign in Kabul. In only three days, their goal is to vaccinate 7 million Afghan children against polio.

There is good news and a lot of bad news.

In Pakistan, the army has begun razing the 30-year-old Jalozai refugee camp, which had provided shelter for 80,000 Afghans, who will now be forced to return home, joining a flood of millions of other refugees.

In Kandahar, five policemen are killed by an improvised mine. In Paktiam, the Taliban have kidnapped two trucks loaded with military equipment, and in Khost the teachers at 15 schools are on strike because they haven't been paid in months. A petite woman named Habiba Sarabi is sitting in the tearoom at the Serena Hotel in Kabul.

She is the governor of Bamyan Province, the country's only female governor. Her region is one of the poorest in a poorhouse of a country. The topography is too mountainous for ordinary farming, the weather is too cold for decent harvests, in the winter the region is often cut off from the outside world for four months at a time, and even in the summer it is relatively inaccessible.

In some parts of Bamyan, 99 percent of residents can neither read nor write. A man is considered wealthy if he owns a mule, and anyone who falls seriously ill is given up for lost. This is the life that 90,000 people lead.

The Italians have promised to build a new road to Kabul, crossing the Hajigag Pass into Wardak Province, but no one has even broken ground yet. Habiba Sarabi says: "We need the wisdom to take advantage of this opportunity, or else we will fail once again, and this time it will be permanent."

That opportunity, she says, is the world's current interest in Afghanistan, an interest that Sarabi is convinced will not last. People are weary, she says, and even former members of the Taliban have laid down their weapons. "There is a development taking place, but it began 'at zero,'" says Sarabi.

A native of Mazar-i-Sharif, she an ethnic Hazara and she's a good woman who knows how to give straightforward answers to simple questions, and who doesn't sugarcoat anything. After studying medicine in Kabul and India, she fled from the Taliban regime in 1996, taking her family with her to Peshawar in neighboring Pakistan. When the Taliban later destroyed the famed Bamiyan Buddhas, she read about the incident in the newspaper.

When President Karzai offered her the governorship three years ago, Sarabi accepted without hesitation. She is undeterred by the fact that death threats are now part of her life, and that other governors refuse to interact with her because she is a woman. "We will also change the brains of men in Afghanistan," she says, "it will take a long time, but it will happen."

Cheerful Little Corners in a Down-at-its-Heels City

Six days before the next attempt on the life of Hamid Karzai, two US military trucks come under rocket fire in Khost, and in Faizabad a delivery truck containing 9,000 schoolbooks plunges into the Kokcha River.

The police defuse a car bomb in Paktia, and in Kabul Chris Alexander, political director of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan (UNAMA), walks across the marketplace to have dinner at the Boccaccio Restaurant.

Alexander is 39, a boyish-looking Canadian, and pundits at home in Canada predict that he has an important political career in his future. He has already been his country's ambassador in Kabul and he worked in Moscow for several years. The World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, chose him as a "Young Global Leader," a distinction that he acknowledges with a shy smile. He orders beef Carpaccio and pizza, while he and his friends at the table discuss the situation.

Drinking Chianti, the four friends, young businessman and diplomats, occasionally glance to the side to greet cabinet ministers who are also fond of dining at Boccaccio.

At the surrounding tables, American intelligence agents cut their steaks, Swedish embassy employees load their forks with spaghetti, and bodyguards from New Zealand drink Corona beer. It is a collection of the members of Kabul's parallel world, envoys of a many thousand-headed army of helpers and mercenaries. After dinner, they go to La Cantina for a cocktail or to Bella Italia for dessert. Kabul, an otherwise down-at-the-heels city, has its cheerful little corners, populated almost exclusively by foreigners from around the world.

Alexander tells the story of how 40 convoys from the World Food Program disappeared last year, somehow, somewhere, entire columns of trucks loaded with food and medicine. Forty civilian aid workers were killed, he says, and 89 were abducted.

Yes, says Alexander, there is a lot of bad news, but there is also good news to report. "We had less than 1,000 schools here in 2001. Today there are 9,000, which is quite impressive."

The conversation at the table soon turns to the Karzai government. It has been in office for six years, but has failed to produce any presentable successes. Two-thirds of the ministries are hopelessly corrupt, they say, the cabinet is split along ethnic lines. As for Karzai? Merely the mention of his name is a source of amusement. He is seen as nothing but a weak, paranoid leader.

Karzai, the Mayor of Kabul

Five days before the next attempt on the life of Hamid Karzai, anti-drug officers in Baghlan incinerate 300 bottles of hard liquor, 94 kilograms of opium, 93 kilograms of hashish and 13 kilograms of heroin. In the afternoon, Foreign Minister Rangin Dadfar Spanta, who returned to the country from exile in Germany, says that he considers the lack of faith in democracy in his country to be his "personal nightmare." On that same afternoon, General Khodaidad, the minister in charge of the government's anti-drug policies, takes a drive out into the countryside.

Khodaidad perches majestically in a four-ton, armor-clad Toyota Land Cruiser, as he embarks on a laborious two-day tour that will take him across thousands of kilometers of bumpy country roads and steep mountain passes.

The general is visiting the governors of Sar-e-Pol and Jowzjan in the far north, near the border with Turkmenistan. Parliamentarians from both regions are also along for the ride, as the Land Cruiser climbs through the icy splendor of the Salang Mountains, through Baghlan, Samangan and Balkh, traveling along the same route taken by the withdrawing Soviet army after almost 10 years of futile fighting.

Khodaidad was part of that army, a Soviet commander from Afghanistan, fighting for Afghanistan. He knows every valley and every hiding place here, and he knows the back roads that no American Humvee will ever take.

Massoud was his adversary in the Pandjir Valley, as was General Daoud, who fought for the mujahedeen and is now a deputy interior minister, and with whom Khodaidad now cooperates in his effort to eradicate opium farming. "It's difficult for you to understand, isn't it? That we now work together? But the explanation is easy: We ruined this country together, and now we must rebuild it together." Khodaidad has brought along a lot of music.

He is a short, impish-looking man with eyes hidden behind fleshy eyelids. His glasses sit so crookedly on his face that he peers through the lens with one eye and over the top of the frame with the other, while the stereo blares the love songs of Afghan pop singer Nashena.

He periodically uses his walkie-talkie to confer with the other drivers in the convoy of five Land Cruisers, which includes an armed guard of 22 soldiers.

A more prosperous and more peaceful Afghanistan soon begins to unfold: the north, where the land is farmed and where there is a rhythm to life, where dromedaries graze and children play -- children who look as though they had time to play.

Khodaidad is using the trip to promote his political agenda, which mainly consists in simply showing his face. The governors he meets, with whom he drinks tea, eats nuts and kebabs and spends entire evenings sitting barefoot on carpets, say that they haven't seen a cabinet minister in their provinces in two years. "Those who never leave Kabul," says Khodaidad, "lose their connections. But what is politics in Afghanistan? Nothing but connections. Have you heard what Karzai is called? The people call him the 'mayor of Kabul'…"

In Sar-e-Pol, late in the evening, Khodaidad's chief of current operations, Mohammed Ibrahim Azhar sits in the garden of the provincial government's guesthouse. One of his brothers died in the struggle against the Soviet occupiers and he lost three cousins in the war against the Russians.

Azhar himself smuggled weapons and money into the country from Pakistan for the mujahedeen. Before taking his current position with the ministry, he worked for the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC). Once a week, he meets with ISAF personnel and Americans to discuss strategy. But he and his foreign counterparts have little to say to each other.

The Americans, says Azhar, refuse to understand that for many Afghans, there is no alternative to growing opium. "There is no market for wheat, rice, fruit or vegetables. We import all of these things, from Pakistan, Iran and China. What can you say to a farmer who makes $4,000 (€2,550) per hectare (2.47 acres) with opium and only $300 (€191) with wheat? A year!"

His telephone rings. His ring tone is the triumphant march from Verdi's "Aida." The people from Nangarhar are calling again. A suicide bomber blew up himself and 25 police officers in an opium field in Nangarhar that afternoon.

Three days before the next attempt on the life of Hamid Karzai, Ambassador William Wood is sitting in his large apartment in the fortress-like US embassy in Kabul. He asks the photographer not to take his picture while he smokes a cigarette. Wood arrived from Colombia last year. His knowledge of drug cultivation is extensive, but he doesn't know a whole lot about Afghanistan. His nickname is "Chemical Bill," because he doggedly champions a policy of large-scale aerial spraying of the poppy fields with pesticides to destroy the crops.

Wood says that Afghanistan's "drug tragedy" also feeds into the tragedy of terror. The ISAF countries, he says, should realize that they are losing more of their citizens to heroin than on the battlefield in Afghanistan. He adds that 2007 was a good year, all things considered, with the possible exception of corruption. All neighboring countries want regional stability, he says, adding that more than 6 million children now attend school in Afghanistan. It sounds as if he were giving a speech using McNeill's notes.

Two days before the next attempt on the life of Hamid Karzai, Najia Zewari, of the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), says that Afghanistan actually looks very good on paper. Women's rights are guaranteed under the constitution, says Zewari, and they are part of the country's future development.

One-fourth of the members of parliament are women but, she adds, "the daily reality is unfortunately a different story altogether."

More nine- and 10-year-old girls are being forced into arranged marriages once again, she says. Outside Kabul, almost all women over 13 are required to wear the burqa. According to Zewari, girls do not go to school, and no one reports kidnappings and rapes. "Do not misunderstand me," says Zewari, "it's a great thing that the terror of the Taliban is over. But that doesn't mean that their rules have disappeared. Their rules are the Afghan rules."

These Afghan rules are the rules that foreigners find so difficult to understand.

The overthrow of the Taliban took place just over seven years ago. Until well into the 1990s, the warlords and the mujahedeen were constantly at war and constantly forming new coalitions. In the area around Kabul, they conducted their own version of total war. The withdrawal of Soviet troops happened less than 20 years ago.

The wounds inflicted by all of these wars are still raw. The country has a great deal of history to work its way through, a great deal of suffering to digest and, most of all, a great deal of mourning to make up for.

But there are already voices -- in the parliament, in Karzai's cabinet and in the remote provinces -- that point to a new rivalry among ethnic groups, groups jockeying for power, influence and the legends of history.

Old warriors with world-famous names, like Dostum and Hekmetyar, are active once again, as old rifts spark anew between the peoples of the country's south and north. Mutual suspicions continue to grow as it becomes clear that the new era is failing to produce successes. Rival clans are already embroiled in their small wars and feuds. Afghanistan remains a combustible country, a potential battlefield where civil war is still an option -- a civil war that some are already waging.

On the day of the attack on Hamid Karzai, Mujahedeen Day, a national holiday in Afghanistan and a day of parades, three men have been lurking for at least 36, probably 72 hours, in a guesthouse less than 500 meters from the Kabul parade ground. Their accomplices have locked them into their room from the outside. A padlock is on the door to create the impression the room is unoccupied. The assassins have stocked up on energy drinks, water and crackers. They urinate into bottles and send short text messages to telephone numbers in Pakistan.

The room on the fourth floor, which offers a clear line of fire at the grandstand where the government of Afghanistan, headed by President Karzai, and the country's top generals and religious leaders, members of parliament and foreign guests, ambassadors, ISAF commanders and UN directors are about to sit down, has been rented for 45 days. One of the attackers, a Turkmen, claimed to be a carpet merchant with business at the nearby bazaar. The weapons are hidden in rolled-up carpets.

Spies for the Defense Ministry have been scanning the area around the parade ground for weeks, asking residents about suspicious activities and strangers new to the area. The police have gone into every house, inspecting rooms and looking out of windows, including the guesthouse where the would-be assassins are holed up, which they visited one or two days before the attack. But the door to the room was locked from the outside, the owner of the guesthouse tells police. The people aren't home, he says, and he hasn't seen them in a while. Why break down the door, he asks?

A Plot against the President

No one has any idea that a police colonel is part of the plot. The Taliban have a mole in the heart of the country's security apparatus. Perhaps their man is guiding preparations for the parade in the wrong direction, or perhaps he is sending police on the wrong track.

The mole is the one who procures the weapons for the attack.

Unable to get sniper rifles, he does manage to bribe his way into buying assault rifles. Corrupt accomplices set the guns aside in an Afghan army training camp, behind the Americans' backs. They even manage to line up a bazooka and a grenade launcher.

The guests begin arriving on the parade ground at 8 a.m. on April 27. McNeill is there, and so is UN Director Chris Alexander. US Ambassador Wood and his British counterpart, Sherard Cowper-Coles, are standing between chairs, chatting. The government of Afghanistan is gathering on the central stands.

At this time, Karzai is standing below the grandstand, in the hatch of a Humvee, waiting for his appearance. At 9 a.m., the Humvee begins traveling at a walking pace along the grandstand, and then it turns toward an honor guard standing at attention in front of the Id Gah Mosque -- a force of 1,000 men, trained by the West to take charge of security for Kabul beginning in August.

At 9:25, Karzai has returned from the honor guard and takes his seat on the grandstand. The attackers wait, less than 500 meters away, keeping a watchful eye on Karzai. They plan to open fire during the national anthem -- for the effect.

At 9:45, the national anthem begins booming from the loudspeakers. "This is the land of Afghanistan, the pride of all Afghans. A land of peace, a land of the sword, a land of courageous sons." A salute is fired, a long series of shots beginning with a single cannon beat, followed by two, three, four and five shots. The assassins get into position and aim their guns.

"This country will shine forever," the hymn continues, as machine gun fire suddenly explodes into the parade. Three members of parliament are hit on the grandstand, 25 meters (82 feet) below Karzai to the right. Grenades explode on the asphalt, killing a child and a policeman in the line of fire.

The people on the parade ground and on the grandstand begin running and jostling, security personnel form rings around their VIPs and lead them away, up along the rows of seats to an area behind the stadium, but there is also shooting there, where a second group of attackers is firing haphazardly at the fleeing dignitaries.

The scene has disintegrated into scores of people ducking and waiting, running and cowering, on this national holiday in Afghanistan, a day that ends up making world headlines. On this day, the news from Afghanistan is not good. In fact, on this day the news from Afghanistan is exclusively bad, chaotic and disastrous.

The next day, US Ambassador Wood will say: "The whole thing was over within 120 seconds." This is the sugarcoated version for the Western public. The people in Afghanistan, however, know that in reality the shooting continued for 25 or 30 minutes, and that the attackers used bazookas, machine guns and grenades.

Soon there were helicopters in the air and the assassination attempt turned into a battle, with the presidential guard returning fire, eventually killing the three attackers and chasing three of their accomplices through the city.

These are the images of war in downtown Kabul, in the heart of Afghanistan, where half the world has spent the last seven years trying to bring peace to an oppressed country, and where the fighting continues, in Afghanistan's valleys, mountains, cities and deserts, on many fronts hard and soft, day after day.

 

Afghanistan counterinsurgency or colonialism?

Globe and Mail (Canada)

31 May

By: DOUG SAUNDERS

NARAY, Afghanistan — To get to Naray, which may be the most lawless place in Afghanistan today, you have to make the long journey up the sniper-filled Kunar River Valley from Jalalabad to Asadabad, where the road ends, and then hitch a ride on a Black Hawk helicopter to this outpost in the far northeast, near the Pakistani border. Here, in the hills, you will find 200 wild-eyed U.S. Army soldiers living in a cluster of tents, sheltering themselves from regular rocket attacks.

I was greeted in a swirl of dust by Lieutenant-Colonel Christopher Kolenda, a clean-cut, steel-eyed officer in the 173rd Airborne, who dragged me into a large tent filled with other officers. They promptly began one of the key battlefield tactics of the new American military — the two-hour PowerPoint presentation.

"The heart of the matter here, as we see it, is a socio-economic dislocation," Col. Kolenda told me, before quoting at length from Kaffirs of the Hindu Kush (Sir George Scott Robertson, 1900) and explaining in detail the anthropology and tribal politics of this region, including some new research he had commissioned from the U.S. government's elite squad of battlefield anthropologists, better known as Human Terrain Specialists.

"There's been an atomization of society here — the elders lost control over their people, and a new elite of fighters came in to fill the vacuum, so what we need to do out here is to re-empower the traditional leadership structures," he continued.

"As you can see here," he said at one point, "as you approach the possibility of self-sufficient development, then you reach what I'll call the developmental asymptote, which is the point we're striving to reach."

This, I pointed out, was not the sort of talk I had expected from the 173rd Airborne, an infantry brigade known for its battlefield ruthlessness. Here at the headwaters of the river, I felt I had encountered some latter-day Colonel Kurtzes, losing themselves in Cartesian twists of logic amid all the mud and dust.

"This is all really new," acknowledged Major Erik Berdy, who had been reading Queen Victoria's Little Wars (Byron Farwell, 1972). "Before, it was totally high-intensity conflict, that was all we discussed. The mental dynamics we have needed to readjust our mentality have been quite dramatic — before, it was 'find, fix and finish,' and the change required to go from there to asymmetric development-focused counterinsurgency has been quite a mind shift."

It certainly is quite a mind shift, one that may have occurred five years too late. When fellow North Atlantic Treaty Organization nations such as Canada are told about plans to "re-Americanize" the Afghanistan war, this new thinking is central to the plan.

The Petraeus doctrine

Within the U.S. military, this is known as population-centric counterinsurgency, an approach that has a cultish following among some officers. It was attempted and then dropped in the Vietnam War (the infamous "strategic hamlets" were at its centre) and there are still officers who believe that Vietnam would have been won if counterinsurgency had been practised to the end.

One of its strongest advocates happens to be General David Petraeus, who has just become the head of the U.S. Central Command, making him responsible for both the Iraq and the Afghanistan wars.

In practice, I found, it looks and sounds a lot more like old-fashioned colonialism. In the tents of Naray, I had the distinct feeling that I had strolled into Uttar Pradesh at some point after 1858, in the early days of the British Raj.

Here, far more so than in the Afghan south, where Canada and Britain are fighting, officers were taking command of entire societies, in hopes of purifying the cultural oxygen that produced the Taliban.

"Our goal," one officer tells me, "is to rebuild the government and society from the ground up in our model."

That means that these officers have to have big pots of money piled up beside their big guns.

Their tool is the Commander's Emergency Response Program (CERP), which in this small province gives the commanding officers an impressive $37.3-million (U.S.) to spend on society-rebuilding programs — similar to what aid organizations would do, if they were allowed out here, but much more closely tied to military goals.

Farther down the valley from this camp, I came across teams of Afghan men in blue uniforms building roads, bridges and mosques, all under the watchful eye of GIs in armoured vehicles. They are being paid the equivalent of $5.50 an hour, which is a huge sum in Afghanistan — and happens to be 50 cents an hour more than what the Taliban pay for fighting.

The goal, though, is not to create U.S. government jobs for all the potential fighters — the Americans are occupying only a tiny sliver of this province, after all.

No, the Americans here are trying to do what they should have done in Iraq five years ago: using former fighters to create enough of a counterbalance of goodwill to tip the scales in favour of their side.

"Our road, bridge, school and health-facility strategy is designed to separate the enemy from the people — it's central to counterinsurgency," says Commander Dan Dwyer of the U.S. Navy, who runs the provincial reconstruction team just to the south, in Asadabad.

"Because of this infrastructure, we've pushed [the Taliban] out of population centres, up into the hills."

Tough love

Lest anyone think this is a soft or peaceful process, Cdr. Dwyer's base was rocked, every minute or so all day, by the terrifying shock of its line of 155-mm howitzers firing their village-destroying shells over the hills and into the Korengal Valley.

The building of mosques and roads is matched with absolutely ferocious fighting in places such as Korengal — the Americans are much more willing to use air strikes and heavy artillery, with the resulting heavy civilian casualties, than other militaries.

There are good reasons to be suspicious of this approach.

"We do not believe in counterinsurgency," a senior French commander tells me. "If you find yourself needing to use counterinsurgency, it means the entire population has become the subject of your war, and you either will have to stay there forever or you have lost."

The Americans obviously see it differently.

"We're trying to raise the opportunity cost of picking up a weapon or growing poppy," says Alison Blosser, a Pashto-speaking State Department official.

(The Americans, unlike Canadians or Brits, have a surprising level of co-operation between their foreign-affairs people and their military officers these days.)

"We want to get to the point where there's long-term sustainable employment that leads to economic growth. … If the insurgents do decide to come back, they will face a great wall of resistance from a population that has experienced economic development."

It sounds good. But I should mention that eastern Afghanistan is facing the highest military casualty rate in the war's history at the moment, and a British report has just concluded that their heavy-handed poppy-eradication strategy is creating hundreds more Taliban fighters.

I ask one officer how long it is going to take to make this new strategy bear fruit.

"Look," he says, "we're still in Germany and Japan 60 years after that war ended. That's how long it can take. I fully expect to have grandchildren who will be fighting out here."

                            ********************

After a US missile killed a senior leader of an Islamist militant group in Somalia, the BBC's Rob Watson considers how serious the West considers the militant threat from the region.

The precise links, if any, between Somalia's Islamists and al-Qaeda are decidedly murky

But there is little doubt that the US and other western countries see Somalia in particular - and East Africa in general - as a potential breeding ground for violent Islamic extremists

Al-Qaeda itself has made little secret of its approval of Islamist fighters in Somalia, with Osama Bin Laden frequently voicing his support for them.

Most of the attention focuses on a group known as al-Shabab, the military wing of the Islamic Courts, the Islamist group that briefly ruled in Mogadishu until ousted at the end of 2006 by Ethiopian forces, backing up Somali government troops.

The US alleges that some of al-Shabab's leaders are "affiliated" to al-Qaeda and have links to the group's leadership hiding out in Pakistan's tribal areas.

Certainly it is known that some Somali jihadists are veterans of the Afghan training camps of the 1990s - including the man killed on Thursday, Aden Hashi Ayro, who was the leader of al-Shabab.

Ungoverned spaces

The US further accuses al-Shabab of protecting foreign al-Qaeda operatives suspected of involvement in the 1998 East Africa embassy bombings, including Fazul Abdallah Mohammed and Saleh ali Saleh Nabhan.

Some US and Somali officials believe his death is a major setback for the insurgency

So is Somalia in danger of becoming the new Afghanistan of East Africa?

Certainly western security sources are worried that the country's large ungoverned spaces are very inviting for would-be jihadists, as are its virtually non-existent border controls.

Indeed it is thought there are already terrorist training camps in Somalia, though on nothing like the scale of pre-9/11 Afghanistan.

But there are vital differences.

The fall of the Islamic Courts has limited the freedom would-be jihadists have to operate in the country and has even led some to leave to surrounding areas.

Added to that, Somalia's intricate clan structure and high levels of violence make it a tough and dangerous place for outsiders, in comparison to the more permissive atmosphere created in much of Afghanistan by the Taleban before their fall from power.

Brutal methods

The question now is what impact the killing of Aden Hashi Ayro will have on the Islamist movement in Somalia.

Some US and Somali officials believe his death is a major setback for the insurgency fighting Somalia's government and its Ethiopian allies.

They argue his brutal methods, including the use of suicide attacks, were deeply unpopular and that his death could make it easier for more moderate Islamists to reach some kind of an agreement with the government.

But they also concede his death could lead to revenge attacks and encourage more young recruits to a movement seen as heroic by many Somalis for standing up to the Americans and their Ethiopian allies

**********************************  

Twenty years ago today the tanks and armoured cars started to rumble north out of Kabul as the Soviet Union began its withdrawal from Afghanistan after eight-and-a-half years of war.

The mujahideen, backed by money and weapons from an alliance of the United States, Britain, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia, had beaten a world superpower.

Today the country is scattered with reminders of the Soviet occupation - you don't have to go far even in Kabul to stumble across the rusting wrecks they left behind.

The aptly named Zamir Kabulov first arrived in Afghanistan as a young Soviet diplomat in 1977 and has lived through the last turbulent 30 years of this country's misfortunes.

Same mistakes

Now he is Russian ambassador in Kabul and his voice of experience will ring in the ears of today's Nato- and US-led forces.

"There is no mistake made by the Soviet Union that was not repeated by the international community here in Afghanistan," Mr Kabulov said, listing the problems.

UK outpost in Helmand province
A British flag flies over a former Soviet outpost in Helmand province

"Underestimation of the Afghan nation, the belief that we have superiority over Afghans and that they are inferior and they cannot be trusted to run affairs in this country."

His list goes on.

"A lack of knowledge of the social and ethnic structure of this country; a lack of sufficient understanding of traditions and religion."

Not only that, but he says the country's new patrons are making their own new mistakes as well.

"Nato soldiers and officers alienate themselves from Afghans - they are not in touch in an everyday manner. They communicate with them from the barrels of guns in their bullet-proof Humvees."

And he admits to some satisfaction, watching those who once backed the mujahideen now suffering in the same way.

"To some extent, yes, I would not hide that. But I am even more satisfied by not having Russian soldiers among Isaf [Nato's International Security Assistance Force] because I don't want them to suffer the same results, implications your soldiers are suffering."

After the Soviet withdrawal the mujahideen turned on each other and tore Afghanistan apart.

Kabul crumbled in the civil war as the various factions rocketed at each other across the city, killing thousands of civilians.

'Killing innocents'

Ahmad Shah Ahmadzai, a mujahideen leader and prime minister in exile during the 1990s, admits they failed in the years following the Soviet withdrawal.

He is now an opponent of the government who stood against President Hamid Karzai in the last election and also draws parallels between the 1980s and the current international mission.

Ahmad Shah Ahmadzai
They were wrong then and the present Nato forces are doing wrong now
Ahmad Shah Ahmadzai
Former mujahideen leader

"The Russians were beaten because they invaded our country. They were the transgressors, not us," he said.

And asked how the Soviet occupation compared to today's mission: "To my opinion the ground situation is no different because the Soviets were imposing their Communist regime on us. The present forces - they are imposing their so-called democracy on us.

"They were wrong then and the present Nato forces are doing wrong now by killing innocent people - men, women and children."

Nato commanders object to this and say they are doing everything they can to stop civilian casualties, arguing they are making military progress against the insurgents.

"They are winning the battles but losing the war," ambassador Kabulov said, explaining that things are even harder now than they were in the 1980s.

"The structures of government then were very much there and our task was very much was to support and to win loyalty - or, if you will, hearts and minds - but we had a working administration."

Fresh wrecks?

In Helmand province British forces in Kajaki are fighting from positions originally built by the Soviets.

Old Soviet tanks slowly rusting in Afghan field
Uncomfortable reminders of wars gone by in this tank graveyard

There are wrecks of armoured vehicles rusting in irrigation ditches in the same places they are now fighting the Taleban.

They are fighting over the same patches of land.

"We didn't bother to collect the wrecks of our burned tanks and other vehicles but you do - you are more resourceful perhaps, or maybe you have fewer losses," the ambassador said.

"But if things continue going the wrong way, as they are now, come back in two years and you will find plenty of your own wrecks."

A negative, sobering but very well-informed opinion - and the kind that is often ignored.


                         

 Afghan president escapes assassination bid

 

27. April 2008, 02:17

By Omar Sobhani, Reuters
Afghan President Hamid Karzai escaped unhurt on Sunday after an assassination attempt by Taliban fighters who fired guns and rockets at an official celebration in the capital, Kabul.

Karzai, government ministers, former warlords, diplomats and the military top brass ducked for cover after gunfire sounded at the celebration to mark the 16th anniversary of the fall of the Afghan communist government to the mujahideen.

Karzai later appeared on state television.

"Today, the enemies of Afghanistan, the enemies of Afghanistan's security and progress tried to disrupt the ceremony and cause disorder and terror," Karzai said.

"Fortunately, Afghanistan's military forces surrounded them quickly and arrested some of the suspects," he said.

The Taliban, which claimed responsibility for the attack, said three of its fighters were killed.

British ambassador Sir Sherard Cowper-Coles was standing on the front row of the dais alongside the U.S. envoy to Kabul.

"It was coming to the end of the 21-gun salute. I saw an explosion and a puff of dust to the left of the parade and then heard the crackle of small arms fire from all directions," he told Reuters.

"After some hesitation, my bodyguard frog-marched me away."

All cabinet members and foreign diplomats present at the parade along with General Dan McNeill, U.S. commander of international forces in Afghanistan, were safe and well, spokesmen said.

But one person was killed and 11 wounded, including a member of parliament, a Defence Ministry spokesman said.

TALIBAN ATTACKERS KILLED

The Taliban firing appeared to come from a building a few hundred meters (yards) from the site, a road which is blocked off for official parades with a dais on one side, close to the presidential palace.

"Three of our attackers have been killed and three managed to escape. Small arms and RPGs (rocket-propelled grenades) were used in the attack," Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid told Reuters from an undisclosed location.

The attack disproved Afghan government and NATO assertions that the Taliban insurgency had been weakened, he said.

"Afghan and NATO authorities this year repeatedly said the Taliban are on the verge of annihilation ... Now it is has been proved to them the Taliban not only have the ability to operate in the provinces, but even in Kabul," said Mujahid.

"Karzai and his cabinet can't be safe from Taliban attacks."

Immediately after the attack, bandsmen in full dress uniform mingled with ordinary soldiers trying to get out of the line of fire. Other soldiers and Karzai's bodyguards, dressed in black, took up firing positions in roads near the parade ground.

Karzai has survived several assassination attempts since he came to power after U.S.-led and Afghan forces toppled the Taliban in late 2001 for failing to hand over al Qaeda leaders behind the September 11 attacks on the United States.

But Taliban insurgents regrouped and relaunched their insurgency two years ago and now fight daily battles with Afghan and foreign troops mainly in the south and east and have launched scores of suicide attacks throughout the country.

The soft-spoken president has repeatedly offered to hold peace talks with the Taliban, but the hardline Islamist militants have said they will fight on till they topple Karzai and drive out the more than 50,000 foreign troops from Afghanistan.

Karzai's government is reliant on foreign aid and Western military support as it tries to bring peace and rebuild a country shattered by nearly 30 years of war.

Facing presidential elections next year, Karzai is looking increasingly besieged as frustration grows among both Afghans and his foreign backers over his failure to crack down on rampant corruption, appoint capable administrators and help bring security to the country.

         Media freedom

 The government is concerned over mounting criticism in the media on issues such as corruption, the insurgency and the alleged disproportionate distribution of power and aid in the country. This has prompted it to try to rein in the independent media.

Journalists protest against killing of reporter by Taleban
Journalists face a growing threat of attack

In April, the legal adviser of Tolo TV, Mohammad Abdollah, was summoned to the Senate.

 

"The Senate's Complaints Commission had a meeting with officials of Tolo... and said the station's programmes were against constitutional law and Islamic values," said the official Bakhtar news agency.

 "The legal adviser of Tolo TV said the station would make changes to its programmes as part of an understanding with parliament and the Ministry of Culture and Information," the report added.

 There are encouraging signs though. It appears that the conservatives and traditionalists have adjusted themselves to the reality of co-existing with independent media.

 Following meetings between the National Union of Afghan Journalists and MPs, parliament - largely dominated by former mojahedin - loosened the government's grip by amending the Media Law.

 This was cautiously welcomed by media activists. Sayed Fazel Sancharaki, the president of the journalists' union, was quoted as saying that the "new law... is better than the former law and is in the interest of media officials and journalists".

 The amended law, now before Mr Karzai for approval, strips the Information and Culture Ministry of some powers that were seen to be aimed at curbing freedom of expression.

 Despite this, activists remain concerned over numerous prohibitions, such as those on defamation and insult, that are vague and open to interpretation.

 As the independent daily Cheragh noted, freedom of expression was "the only achievement" of the government in the last five years, something that had to be safeguarded.

 BBC Monitoring selects and translates news from radio, television, press, news agencies and the internet from 150 countries in more than 70 languages. It is based in Caversham, UK, and has several bureaux abroad.

Western Aid Failing to Reach Afghanistan, Report Says

Residents of Kama Ado, Afghanistan, survey the damage to a house in December 2001, after a US bombing raid
 
Aid agencies said that up to $10 billion (6.5 billion euros), or 40 percent, of promised aid to Afghanistan has not been delivered by the West. Germany and the EU, however, questioned the organizations' calculations.

Aid agencies said that up to $10 billion (6.5 billion euros), or 40 percent, of promised aid to Afghanistan has not been delivered by the West, and what does arrive bypasses the Afghan government.

 

Western countries have failed to carry through on their pledges of aid to Afghanistan, according to a report by the Agency Coordinating Body For Afghan Relief (ACBAR). The umbrella group of non-governmental organizations which work in Afghanistan said the international community had pledged $25 billion to Afghanistan since 2001, when the extremist Taliban government was toppled, but that up to $10 billion had not reached the country.

 

The US government -- the biggest international donor to Afghanistan -- "has one of the biggest shortfalls," providing only half of the $10.4 billion dollars of pledged money until 2008, the report said.

 

An Afghan man working on a new building Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Aid for development just a "fraction" of military expenditure

The European Commission and Germany had delivered less than two-thirds of their respective $1.7 billion and $1.2 billion in commitments, ACBAR said.

 

But a spokesperson for the German Development Ministry disputed that statement, saying that his country had paid up more than 90 percent of the money it had pledged between 2001 and 2006.

 

The European Commission also rejected the allegations.

 

"We are delivering - there is no delay, no backlog, no shortfall or lagging behind," a spokeswoman for the European Commission's external-affairs chief in Brussels said.

 

Exaggerated costs

 

The report said the World Bank had distributed just over half of its promised funds.

 

Furthermore, "just $15 billion in aid has so far been spent, of which it is estimated a staggering 40 percent has returned to donor countries in corporate profits and consultant salaries … vastly pushing up expenditures," the report said.

 

"For example, a road between the center of Kabul and the international airport cost the United States more than $2.3 million per kilometer, at least four times the average cost of building a road in Afghanistan."

 

Many of the full-time expatriate consultants working for private companies in Afghanistan receive $250,000 to $500,000 a year, including salary, allowances and other costs, the report said.

 

A "fraction" spent on aid

 

The report, entitled "Falling Short," was written by the aid group Oxfam for ACBAR. ACBAR is made up of 94 agencies, including Oxfam, Christian Aid, CARE, Islamic Relief and Save the Children.

 

The group said that foreign money spent on aid, development and reconstruction is now just "a fraction" of military expenditures.

 

An Afghan farmer holding a poppy bud in his hand AfghanistanBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Afghanistan is the biggest producer of poppy-derived opium for heroin

The US military alone spends some $100 million a day in fighting insurgents in Afghanistan, but average spending on aid by all donors since 2001 has amounted to only $7 million daily.

 

"Given the links between development and security, the effectiveness of aid also has a major impact on peace and stability," ACBAR said. "Yet thus far aid has been insufficient and in many cases wasteful and ineffective."

 

In addition, Afghanistan received just $57 per capita in aid in the two years after international intervention in 2001, compared to $679 a head in Bosnia and $233 in East Timor, ACBAR said.

 

Inefficiency and corruption are problematic

 

Some of the shortfalls, however, could be attributed to "challenging operating conditions, high levels of corruption and weak absorption capacities," ACBAR noted.

 

The group said this demonstrated the need for donors to solve such problems, adding that the weaknesses could be the reason that about two-thirds of foreign assistance bypassed the Afghan government -- undermining attempts to build effective state institutions.

 

World Bank country manager Mariam Sherman told AFP news agency that its disbursal rate -- estimated to be about 50 percent -- was "actually very good." But she conceded that while the World Bank channeled all its funds through the government budget, it was a problem that so much of it bypassed the administration.

 

German soldiers in AfghanistanBildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Germany has more than 3,000 soldiers in Afghanistan

"To build a state and be accountable to its people, the government needs to have a say in resource allocation," Sherman told AFP.

 

Extreme poverty prevails

 

ACBAR stressed that despite the formation of the Western-backed Afghan government six years ago, the country still suffers from extreme poverty. Just 20 percent of the population has access to potable water; only 5 percent has electricity.

 

The group also drew attention to recent reports from the southern province of Ghazni which said that residents in remote villages were eating grass to quell their hunger.

 

ACBAR called on the international community to increase aid and ensure that it makes a lasting effect for the poorest Afghans.

 

"Aid must address Afghan needs, build local capacities and help Afghans help themselves," said Matt Waldman, Afghanistan policy adviser at Oxfam and the report's author.

        Afghanistan has a lively media scene, with hundreds of publications and radio and TV stations.

Newspapers tend to speak to the political elite, believing that it is the sector of society that can bring about change. The press tackles issues openly, including sensitive themes such as corruption and nepotism.

But some matters are not dealt with by state-owned media. Government-run TV, for example, shies away from openly criticising the regional powerhouses of Pakistan and Iran.

This is not to say that the private media are fully independent. Aina (Mirror) TV is known to support the northern-based warlord Abdorrashid Dostum.

The most popular TV station remains the privately-owned Tolo (Dawn). Its investigative journalism and entertainment programmes are favoured by the younger generation and resented by the conservative sectors of society.

Domestic politics: Karzai's woes

Several fronts have opened against President Hamed Karzai simultaneously and factions have emerged within his government.

 
 

The United National Front - an unlikely alliance of former mojahedin and communists set up last autumn - says it wants to work with Mr Karzai, but its proclaimed aim is to switch to a parliamentary system and elected provincial governors.

Mr Karzai's own advisor, former Defence Minister Marshal Fahim, who is in the Front, has said the president is "weak" and has set up "a unilateral government", instead of one representing all ethnic groups.

And in May, Mr Karzai was forced to defend his foreign minister, Rangin Dadfar-Spanta, through the Supreme Court after a majority of MPs voted to impeach him over alleged poor handling of Iran's deportation of Afghan refugees.

TV stations were cautious in their reporting, while newspapers were outspoken. The independent Daily Afghanistan said the impeachment case "demonstrated parliament's immaturity" and added that the vote had been "rigged".

The pro-government Weesa criticised the foreign minister for revealing what it called "a high-level secret"; that Iran's ulterior motive may have been to gain access to Afghanistan's water supplies.

"If Iran is exerting pressure on our country because of Helmand river water... why did the foreign minister not reveal this before?" the paper asked.

The views presented in the Afghan press may point to factions emerging within the government.

Relations with powerful neighbours

Distrust between Afghanistan and Pakistan stems largely from Kabul's complaints that Islamabad allows Taleban militants based in Pakistan to cross the border and mount attacks inside Afghanistan.

Pakistani soldier on Afghan border
Afghanistan and Pakistan have a long-running border dispute

The two countries have long-standing border disputes and their forces clashed several times in May after Pakistan began to fence parts of the border despite strong objections from Afghanistan.

After a one-day visit to Kabul on 5 June, Pakistani Prime Minister Shaukat Aziz pledged his country's willingness to cooperate on security, but reaction in the local media was negative.

"Pakistani actions have forced us once again to doubt the sincerity of the Pakistani premier's comments because experience has shown that Pakistan does the opposite of what it says," wrote the independent daily Rah-e Nejat.

Meanwhile, tension has mounted between Afghanistan and Iran over accusations that Iran is supplying arms to the Taleban, as well as Iran's deportation of Afghan refugees.

Afghan media reported that allegations over Iranian-made arms captured in western Afghanistan had been played down by Mr Karzai and US Defence Secretary Robert Gates.

The media are upset at Afghanistan getting caught up in the US-Iran dispute.

"The decision by those countries to use Afghanistan as a platform for their long-standing hostility is unacceptable and unjustifiable," wrote Rah-e Nejat.

Ongoing insecurity

The media in Afghanistan are divided over the reasons for the deteriorating security situation.

Perhaps resorting to military action alone is not the solution to the problem
state-run paper Etefaq-e Eslam

The state-run daily Hewad blames warlords and the gun culture - the legacy of nearly three decades of turmoil.

But a roundtable discussion on Tolo TV suggested that the government's "weak" response to security incidents had contributed to the rising incidence of suicide attacks in the capital.

Participants in a discussion programme on Aina TV accused "specific circles" within the government of destabilising the situation in the north in an effort to form a powerful central government at the expense of local politicians.

Civilian casualties and the behaviour of foreign troops in Afghanistan have also been mentioned as factors contributing to security problems.

"Uncoordinated and arbitrary operations, especially by US troops... have spurred feelings against foreign troops in the country and convinced the people to help the Taleban," said Rah-e Nejat.

Arman-e Melli highlighted the links between reconstruction and security and said one of the reasons for Nato's "failure" in Afghanistan was the lack of attention given to reconstruction and improving the living conditions of the people.

Etefaq-e Eslam attempted to answer questions raised by ordinary Afghans puzzled by the lack of success in restoring stability, despite the international community's good will.

"Perhaps resorting to military action alone is not the solution to the problem," it said

Corruption at "unprecedented" levels

Both private and state-run publications run features on what is seen as rampant corruption.

Profession, knowledge, experience, official background and skills are still ignored in most ministries and independent departments
independent paper Arman-e Melli

Hewad captured the general mood in the media when it said "government and public property has been plundered to a degree unprecedented in the 5,000-year history of this war-hit country."

Arman-e Melli went a stage further, saying most of those accused of corruption "are supported by some senior officials".

"Profession, knowledge, experience, official background and skills are still ignored in most ministries and independent departments."

Sounding a note of pessimism, the independent weekly Mosharekat-e Melli believes the government may have given up the fight.

"Fighting corruption... is no longer the government's plan, and this might be because of the government's failure in tackling them effectively."

Failure of drugs policy

Private and state media approach the drugs issue in the same way: they focus on the failure of the official counter-narcotics strategy, blaming corruption and government inefficiency.

Poppy farmer
There is sympathy for labourers in the poppy fields

Afghan media are also aware of the way the drugs problem has damaged the country's reputation.

While official media appeal to farmers to stop growing poppy for the sake of Afghanistan's reputation abroad, independent media generally side with poppy farmers, pointing out that the West has failed to tackle the demand for drugs.

And in a recent TV interview, an Afghan professor said that it was probable that foreign forces were themselves involved in the drugs trade.

There is growing interest in other aspects of the drugs problem, including addiction and health issues.

Recently, there have been a growing number of factual reports about the increase in the number of female and teenage drug addicts.

While addiction among these groups of society has been linked to poverty and ignorance, the prominent view is still that addiction is a habit that young male Afghan refugees picked up in exile in Iran and Pakistan.


Afghanistan | 21.04.2008

Chief EU Diplomat Restates Europe's Commitment to Afghanistan

 
 
 Javier Solana, the European Union's foreign policy chief, reiterated Europe's commitment to "the long haul" in Afghanistan during a visit to Kabul.

Solana said the European Union was dedicated to the reconstruction of the war-torn country and the eradication of extremism.

"I can tell you on behalf of the European Union -- all the countries of the European Union -- that we will continue to be working with the government, working with the people of Afghanistan for the long haul," Solana said after meeting with Afghan President Hamid Karzai and other senior ministry officials in the fortified presidential palace in Kabul on Monday, April 21.

"We, the people in Europe, will continue to be helping the people of Afghanistan to get what they deserve, the stability, prosperity and peace," he added.

A renewed commitment

Javier Solana Bildunterschrift: Großansicht des Bildes mit der Bildunterschrift:  Solana praised the on-going efforts in Afghanistan

Solana jetted into the capital for a day-long trip which, he said in remarks published in a Kabul daily Monday, came at an important time of "renewed commitment by the international community" to struggling Afghanistan.

Following his arrival, Solana paid a visit to the headquarters of the EU Police Mission in Afghanistan (EUPOL) and met with police officials.

Since June of last year, some 230 EUPOL officials have been training the upper echelons of the Afghan security forces. EUPOL is also assisting other Western training missions and is now spreading its operations to cover the whole country.

Solana praised the progress that Afghanistan has made in the past several years since the fall of the Taliban, saying "tremendous efforts have been done in education. The tremendous effort ... done in health is something that we take into great consideration."

Europe is the second largest contributor after the United States to military and development efforts in Afghanistan since the 2001 fall of the extremist Taliban regime, and President Karzai praised the European Union as "among the best supporters of Afghanistan."

High hopes for Paris donors' conference

 

********************************************                        

Afghanistan map highlighting Kandahar

Authorities in Afghanistan say police killed nine Taliban

militants Tuesday, a day after six policemen were killed in an attack on a checkpoint in the southern part of the country.

On Monday, Taliban militants attacked a police checkpoint in Kandahar province, near the Pakistani border.

 

A police commander in the region said 200 policemen searching for the attackers clashed with the militants, killing nine of them.

Meanwhile, in the western Afghan province of Herat, authorities say they believe militants have abducted two foreign employees of a U.S. security company.

Police say an Indian and a Nepalese worker disappeared Monday evening while traveling in the Adraskan district.  Their driver also is missing.

In other news, the U.S. commander of the NATO-led force in Afghanistan says Afghan forces should be able to secure most of the country by 2011, allowing international troops to start withdrawing

In an interview published Monday in The New York Times, General Dan McNeill said Afghan army and police forces have already been managing security for the capital, Kabul, for the past year, with NATO support.

The issue of NATO involvement in Afghanistan has caused strains within the alliance.  Some NATO members have been reluctant to send troops, or to allow their troops to operate in areas where a resurgent Taliban movement is most active.

German Islamists Plans Afghan Attacks, Police Say

During their discussions, Solana and Karzai discussed a number of other issues including security, governance, and rule of law in Afghanistan, as well as the international preparation for the Afghan donors' conference in Paris in June.

"This is the moment to reflect on what we, the international community, can do, working in conjunction with our Afghan partners, to enhance our efforts," he said of the up-coming conference.

Afghanistan is hoping the donors' meeting in Paris will secure $50 billion (30 billion euros) in aid to implement a five-year development plan, Finance Minister Anwar-ul haq Ahadi said Monday.

The plan, called the National Development Strategy (ANDS), was presented to donors at an "aid effectiveness" conference in Kabul at the same time as Solana's meeting.

Based on a year of wide-ranging consultations, it will be assessed by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, Ahadi told reporters after the meeting. The finalized strategy would become the basis of requests from donors at the June conference, he said.

"For this strategy, the Afghan government has asked the world for $50 billion in aid for five years," he said.

The ANDS was a comprehensive plan, the minister said. "All walks of government are included: security, good governance, financial growth, important issues such as counter-narcotics, capacity building and equal rights of women..."

Afghan solutions for Afghan problems

The plan underlines Europe's commitment to restoring Afghanistan's infrastructure and the return of the power to the people.

In written comments for the Daily Outlook Afghanistan newspaper, Solana said it was "important that Afghan solutions are found to Afghan problems."

And success would involve more than a military effort to eliminate extremists, whose ranks are said to be reinforced, trained and equipped by militant camps in neighboring Pakistan.

"The approach must be global and joined up, encompassing the rule of law, development, reconstruction, economic growth, rural development and education," Solana said. "It is very important that the efforts should be led by Afghans," he said, reflecting growing demands by Karzai and his government for more ownership of the work in their country.

Despite the Paris conference's emphasis on civilian assistance, it is likely that the financial cost and loss of soldiers killed fighting Taliban extremists will also be discussed, at a time of growing doubts within  some allied nations about the mammoth mission, which has been criticized as wasteful and disjointed.

 

Two men from German Islamist circles are planning terrorist strikes in Afghanistan, Germany's Federal Crime Office (BKA) said on Thursday, April 3. A spokesman said security officials have issued warnings.

The police were commenting on a report in the German news magazine Focus, which spoke of planned suicide bombings at German installations in Afghanistan, where Germany has around 3,500 troops stationed as part of a NATO-led peacekeeping mission.

 

While police confirmed that they had issued warnings about possible attacks, they declined to comment on details in the news article.

 

"We have warned our national and international partners, and possibly endangered institutions, of terrorist activities by two people from the German Islamist spectrum," a BKA spokesman told Reuters.

 

Focus reported on its Web site on Thursday that a 20-year-old German national, identified as Eric B., was thought to have links to the three men arrested in Germany last year who allegedly planned attacks on US installations in Germany. It also reported that besides the German, an Egyptian national was also involved.

 

Picture distributed

 

The magazine reported that the BKA, along with its warnings, sent a picture of Eric B. to the German embassy in Kabul. His photo has also been posted at German organizations in Afghanistan.

 

Officials are particularly worried that since Eric B. speaks fluent German, he could win the confidence of German troops or groups in Afghanistan. According to the magazine, his apparent targets were soldiers or policemen, although civilian organizations are also thought to be at risk.

 

Last month, a video surfaced apparently showing Germany's first Muslim suicide bomber in Afghanistan.

 

Cüneyt Ciftci, a 28-year-old man of Turkish descent who was born in Bavaria, blew himself up outside a government building in Afghanistan, killing two US soldiers and two Afghanis.

 

BKA chief Joerg Ziercke said the video risked radicalizing Islamists in Germany.

         

Q&A: Isaf troops in Afghanistan
British soldier with an Afghan man in Kabul
Isaf says it aims to help stabilise the country

The majority of foreign troops in Afghanistan are under the command of the Nato-led International Security Assistance Force (Isaf).

Established by the UN Security Council in December 2001, its stated role is to promote security and development.

Who are the main contributors to Isaf and what is its mandate?

The launch of Isaf was Nato's first and largest ground operation outside Europe. Isaf is made up of about 41,000 personnel from 39 different countries including the US, European countries, Australia, Jordan and New Zealand.

The largest contributing nations to Isaf are the US and Britain. They provide around 16,000 and 7,800 troops respectively.

The US also has about 13,000 troops under Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) - mostly in the east of Afghanistan on the border with Pakistan - that are not under Isaf's command.

Isaf's mission was initially limited to Kabul, but on 13 October 2003 the UN Security Council authorised it to expand its operation to other parts of the country. From October 2006 it has operated in all the provinces of the country.

German Nato soldier in Afghanistan - photo February 2007
Some Isaf member countries want more help from Nato

Isaf's stated role is to help the government of Afghanistan maintain security across the country by conducting operations in co-ordination with the Afghan National Army. It also mentors and supports efforts by them to disarm illegal militias.

Nato says that the long-term aim is to help establish conditions in which Afghanistan can enjoy a stable and representative government after decades of conflict.

Who commands Isaf and how often is the leadership rotated?

Until August 2003, command of Isaf rotated among different nations on a six-month basis. But because of difficulties in finding new lead nations, Nato took over responsibility for appointing commanders.

Since then, Isaf has been commanded by generals from Germany, Canada, Turkey, Italy, Britain and the US who have been in charge for between six months to a year.

What is the state of relations between countries contributing to and working with Isaf?

ISAF is being backed by 28,600 troops of the Afghan National Army and 30,200 Afghan policemen, who are described by the British Ministry of Defence as "fully equipped and trained".

Recently the US has attempted to encourage its Nato allies to boost their combat roles in southern Afghanistan.

Graph showing principal contributors to ISAF troop numbers in Afghanistan

But Germany has made it clear it will not provide more than the 3,200 troops already based in the north of the country. Canada has warned it will pull its troops out of Afghanistan unless Nato reinforcements are sent.

Some critics have argued that communication between Isaf and thousands of American troops - including special forces - serving with OEF is not as strong as it should be.

They argue this is particularly the case when it comes to civilian casualties, when Isaf and OEF have been accused of issuing contradictory accounts of the number of people killed and the circumstances of the attack.

Where is Isaf deployed in Afghanistan and what are its armaments?

The bulk of Isaf's forces are in the insurgency-wracked south and east of the country, especially in the provinces of Helmand and Kandahar.

Elsewhere, Isaf troops are engaged more in peacekeeping and reconstruction than in fighting.

The division of responsibilities is the result of decisions by national governments to keep their own troops away from major combat.

This has resulted in a list of caveats which prevent their troops from being deployed in certain areas and circumstances.

Isaf has access to a wide range of weaponry from tanks and armoured personnel carriers to air support from the US and British air forces.

But military analysts say that it can be difficult to use this weaponry effectively because clashes with the Taleban tend to take place in remote and inhospitable areas where much of the fighting is at close quarters.

Is Isaf's role purely a military one?

 Isaf officials can often be heard saying that development without security is unachievable, and security without development is meaningless.

British troops in Helmand
Much of the combat carried out by Isaf is at close quarters

It says that its mission in Afghanistan is to bring lasting peace and stability, and while that primarily involves the use of military personnel to secure the country, it also requires reconstruction and development initiatives.

It says that its activities in these fields include rebuilding damaged schools and hospitals and restoring water supplies and damaged infrastructure.

In order to so, Isaf says it has deployed 25 Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRTs) in different parts of the country.

What are the views of ordinary Afghan civilians towards Isaf?

A poll commissioned by the BBC in December across all of Afghanistan's 34 provinces revealed that most Afghans supported the presence of overseas troops, and opposed the Taleban.

Around 71% of respondents said they supported or strongly supported the presence of US military forces in Afghanistan, with 67% supporting or strongly supporting the Isaf peacekeeping mission.

Overall, the figures indicated that the peaceful north of Afghanistan was significantly more satisfied than the troubled south. Most dissatisfaction was found in the south-west, where the Taleban are most active.

The poll suggested that despite another year of conflict, confidence and hope in the future were only slightly dented.

ISAF REGIONAL COMMANDS AND RECONSTRUCTION TEAMS
Map showing regional commands and reconstruction areas in Afghanistan
Countries contributing more than 1,000 troops (6 February 2008):
Australia - 1,070
Canada 2,500
France 1,515
Germany - 3,210
Italy - 2,880
Netherlands - 1,650
Poland - 1,100
UK - 7,800
US - 15,000
Figures approximate
Source: ISAF

   *************                     
 
Quick guide: Afghanistan

Afghanistan is strategically placed between the Middle East, central Asia and the Indian subcontinent. For centuries, foreign armies have fought over it and tried to conquer it.

Many have been defeated by the rugged terrain - mountains cover four-fifths of the land - and fierce resistance from the different tribal groups.

WHAT IS A QUICK GUIDE?
Quick guides are concise explanations of topics or issues in the news.

Ethnic, religious and regional rivalries and the terrain have also made it hard for the authorities in the capital, Kabul, to rule the country.

Soviet invasion

The overthrow of Afghanistan's King Zahir Shah in 1973 sparked a chain of events that led to decades of unrest. Reforms imposed by a Moscow-backed regime sparked rebellions and, in 1979, Soviet troops invaded Afghanistan.

Map of Afghanistan

US-backed Islamic fighters known as mujahideen - among them Osama Bin Laden - fought the Soviets and the country became a Cold War battleground.

In 1989, the USSR withdrew in defeat, leaving behind a devastated country and hundreds of thousands of dead Afghans.

Rise of the Taleban

After the Soviet forces left, a number of Afghan factions continued to fight for control of the country. In 1994, the hard-line Islamic Taleban emerged. By the late 1990s, they controlled most of Afghanistan with their strict version of Sharia law.

The Taleban angered the international community by letting Osama Bin Laden, and other al-Qaeda members, live there.

In 2001, after the 9/11 attacks on the US, the Taleban refused to hand him over, paving the way for a new war.

US-led war

In October 2001, the US and its allies launched a bombing campaign against the Taleban marking the beginning of America's "war on terror". Within weeks, US-led troops and local fighters forced the Taleban from Kabul and drove them from power.

But Taleban leader Mullah Omar and Osama Bin Laden evaded capture and are thought to have survived the offensive.

Several thousand US troops remain in Afghanistan hunting Taleban supporters who have regrouped since 2003.

Rebuilding the country

Years of fighting have left Afghanistan in ruins - it is one of the poorest countries in the world. International donors have pledged more than $10bn, but the government says it needs more.

In 2004 a constitution was signed and Hamid Karzai won the country's first direct presidential elections.

In 2005 national assembly elections were held.

Uncertain future

Islamic militants, warlords and the booming drugs trade are among the greatest threats to stability. The authorities have limited power outside Kabul, and huge swathes of the country are controlled by warlords once funded by the US to fight the Taleban.

WANT TO KNOW MORE?
Have we missed anything out? Do you want to suggest a subject for a Quick Guide?

Many of these powerful regional militia chiefs have a history of drug trafficking and human rights abuses.

The state of lawlessness is fuelled by the opium trade. Despite a ban on poppy crops, Afghanistan still produces about 90% of the world's opium, which accounts for about a third of the country's economy.

**********************                      

Prince Harry has been greeted by his dad and brother on his return from 10 weeks of Army service in Afghanistan.

Prince Charles and Prince William welcomed Harry back to the UK when his plane touched down in Oxfordshire.

The 23-year-old Prince was pulled out of Afghanistan after the news got out that he was serving in the country.

Harry was brought home because Army bosses were worried that he would become a target for fighters, putting himself and others in even more danger.

The Prince had secretly been in Helmand Province fighting the Taleban, a group which used to control the country.

He was able to be there while no-one reported on what he was doing, but other countries let the secret slip.

Prince Harry on duty
Prince Harry

Harry may be leaving Afghanistan, but there are still thousands of men and women fighting there.

Chance

He's always said he wanted to use his Army training and fight like any other soldier in places like Afghanistan.

But it's not clear whether he'll ever have the chance to do that again.

 

**********************************                              

A page in the history of Afghanistan

 If we look at the history of our country Afghanistan we can clearly see that demand for progress, constitutionalism, liberalism, Afghan student’s movement, and king Amanullah’s movement are all interrelated. It was during the latter that for the first time ever in the history of Afghanistan the very first constitution of 1923 was promulgated by King Amanullah Khan, in which for the first time ever, such matters as citizen, natural rights, human rights and civil rights of the people were proposed. However, the liberal movement in our country has consistently been under attacks by the anti progress and modernization religious fanatical extremists ever since. Liberalism also suffered as a result of communism and even the two forces of the extreme left and right combined in a unholy front prevented peace and security, modernization and freedom of the country and denied the people of Afghanistan their natural rights, human rights and civil rights, thus depriving the people of Afghanistan of their national interests. If you refer to the programme of the liberal democrat party of Afghanistan, you will see that the issue of safe guarding democracy and freedom to mean the civil freedom and natural and human rights and the belief in the national sovereignty and rule of law and non-ideological political system, safe guarding the rights of women, have been firmly and clearly reflected. Essentially the defence of political freedom is not only the fundamental principal of the liberal democrat party of Afghanistan and the Tribal National understanding Council of Afghanistan, and National Unity Counsel for democracy but we also strongly believe that with the will and determination of the people, a regime based on the rule of law and democracy in which all Afghans will enjoy equal rights to build a free and modern society will be installed

+ نوشته شده توسط در دوشنبه دوازدهم فروردین 1387 و ساعت 18:47 |

       

 

               we want right of speech            

           

  To his Excellency Ban ki moon the General Secratry of the UN

Dear Sir

The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan is of the opinion that the UN and the NATO member countries have sent their troops to Afghanistan in order to repel fanatical religious and terrorist forces and help restore peace and stability in the country and help the people of Afghanistan maintain democracy, human rights, and their political and civil freedom. They are certainly not for the protection of rapacious warlords who are the lynchpin of drug trafficking and are notorious war criminals, committed large scale human rights abuses

It so appears that after the Bonn conference, political, financial, military, and state power has remained in the hands of these de-facto rulers of Afghanistan. They have continued with their repression of the innocent and defenceless people of Afghanistan. They are trying to suppress democratic voices by means of intimidation and killing of tens of journalists and other men of opinion for their beliefs. The persecution of Mr Abdul Rahman for conversion of his creed and the sentencing to death by means of hanging of Mr Kambakhsh are vivid examples of injustice and criminal behaviour of these warlords who have taken the law in to their hands

We have also witnessed yet again another violent, vindictive and inhumane action and antisocial behaviour of another warlord i.e. Rashid Dostum who on the 3rd of February 2008 carried out a raid on the residence of his opponent and resorted to the beating and kicking around of a respected law abiding Afghan citizen by the name of Akbar Bai and his family members including his wife. This is absolutely outrageous

The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan, while condemning such rampant violation of human rights in the strongest possible terms, demand that decisive and practical measures be adopted against these criminals who have committed human rights abuses and looted the properties of the people of Afghanistan in the past three decades. They must be brought to justice before it is too late for the world community to regain the momentum and the trust of the Afghans in the West and the UN

The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan also believe that in the last Afghan election unfortunately everything went their way. They had the financial backing of the West both in the capital Kabul and in the countryside/ They also enjoyed the publicity and the legitimacy that was provided by the US for these criminals. In the process of these elections, to our great dismay, democratic and patriotic forces (National forces) in the country were totally ignored by the West. Only a handful of democrats and technocrats who upon the persistence of the international community had managed to participate in the formation of the Afghan government who could have made a real difference in the political process towards democracy, were also eventually isolated and removed through conspiracies. The remaining few democratic elements within the government have remained in difficult situation. The Liberal Democrat Party of Afghanistan call upon the UN, US, European community with due respect to help prevent these criminals and human right abusers of Afghanistan from committing more crimes and abuses in the country. They must not be allowed to deny the people of Afghanistan their civil and social liberties. We also hope that you the Excellency will personally intervene in the case of Mr Kambakhsh and help secure his release from the clutches of these barbaric institutions. Let us put an end to the flagrant violation of human rights in Afghan society by the fanatical religious forces and bring restore security, peace, freedom, and justice in Afghanistan

The Leadership Council of the Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan

               

+ نوشته شده توسط در سه شنبه ششم فروردین 1387 و ساعت 22:21 |

http://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.html

3/3/2008

To His Excellency Ban Ki Moon

The UN General Secretary

Then fanatical and extreme religious forces in the region and the world at large under the name of so called sharia law and Islam mercilessly violate the civil, political and social freedom and liberties of the Muslim citizens of our country. They imply human rights as a message from the infidels and the west and wish to carry on with their tyrant, repressive and fanatical dictatorial regime, resorting to fanatical dictatorship through fake religious legitimacy and thus with the help of such violent traditions and demagogic behaviour, wish to carry on with their violation of human rights and liberties

It is ironical that these fanatical forces behave in a coordinated manner in the region

We’ve recently had another violation of human rights by the Iranian repressive regime with regards to Mr. Ali Mahaqiq Nasab, the afghan journalist who was arrested in January 2008 in the city of Khom and transferred to an unknown location in contradiction with all human rights. While condemning this brutal action of human rights violation and persecution in the strongest terms, the Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan is requesting your Excellency with due respect to kindly interfere in the matter and help release the Afghan journalist. This is not only the violation of human rights of all those who have a different opinion and opposed to the Iranian regimes, but an interference in the internal affairs of Afghanistan

The Liberal Democratic party of Afghanistan have constantly called upon the intellectuals and defenders of human rights to unite in the fight against fanatical Islamic extremism and repel their plots and conspiracies and pre-empt their actions from impeding the process of peace, stability and progress in our country and the region. We also call upon the US, the EU and all the democratic forces of the world to back the defenders of democracy so that the terrorist and the extremist militants are stopped

With kind regards

The central council of the Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan

+ نوشته شده توسط در سه شنبه ششم فروردین 1387 و ساعت 22:16 |

 http://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.html

Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan’ message to

the national intellectuals supportive of democracy and

human rights in the region and the world

The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan for the sake of Democracey and Peace and human ritghs in Afghanistan have struggled against the left and right extreme forces who are the main cause of war and dictatorship in our society for many International communtity for the Liberation of the people of Afghanistan from the clutches of terrony and repression of the extreme forces and have raised this issue the president of the EU member of the Parliament in London and internatioal organization in favor of democracy and human rights and we have continuously worked for the awareness of our people and the international Community through our communique and meeting It.s a matter of grave concern that so far contrary to the principles of democracy and the whishes of the Afghan nation. peace and security has not been maintained , freedom of thout and speech has not been guarateed and our people continue to suffer under the war lords and fundamental religious forcec repression

Unfortunately despite the pledges of the internatioinal community and UN for the defeuse of democracy and human rights, the have not been able to and distract the power of the various so called islamice parties and warlords which have been the cause of war repression, dictatorship, and violation of human rights in our coutry in the past three decades and on the contrary these extreme forces have been cncouragcd and brought to power. Such fundamentalist forccs have managed to seize power and monopolized the three main pillars of the government i,e the judiciary, legislative and executive powers by means of deceit and bully

Financial and administrative corruption, drug dealing has been the order of the day. Lack in unbiased, fair and prudent judiciary system which is one of the main principles in a democratic society, and the absence of sound administration has taken a toll on the defenseless and suffering pe people of Afghanistan. The Liberal Democratic Party of Afghanistan believes and proposes the following

 Without a soud administration and managment and a democratic law, any sacrifice of the people of Afganistan and the international communitiec help in support towards security and reconstruction and the rule of law and democracy, will not bring tangible results

 In order to bring about sccurty democracy progress and freedom to the people of Afghanistan and get rid of fundamentalism, the people of Afghanistan need international help and support tremendously

 the present government must give accounts of all the financial aids, since the bon conference, that are provided by international communities to the people of Afghanistan in a transparent way they are accoutable before the people of Afganistan and the world community

 such financial aids must be targeted and fundamental strategie projects for the people of Afghanistan and should be spent on raising the living stands of the people of Afganistan

 for the purpose of controlling supervision of the expenses and distribution of such financial aids so that such funds are spent wisely, a commission composed of national and international members is urgently required to be set up so that it could oversee international aids, which have been pledged at various international conferences such as London conference

   with kind regards

 issa Eshaghzey                        

President of liberal Democratic Party

+ نوشته شده توسط در سه شنبه ششم فروردین 1387 و ساعت 22:13 |
http://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.htmlhttp://www.stanford.edu/~grg/photography/blue_flower.html 
Mr. M  ISSA ESHAGHZEY PRESIDENT OF THE LIBERAL
DEMOCRATIC  PARTY OF AFGHANISTAN NOMINATES THE WORLD MEDAL OF FREEDOM
 
 
 
+ نوشته شده توسط در سه شنبه ششم فروردین 1387 و ساعت 22:10 |